Peoples estimates of uncertain quantities are commonly influenced by irrelevant values (anchoring effect). We suppose the presence of the cognitive dissonance reduction related with anchoring. 28 participants filled out a form with anchoring-loaded task twice with a three week interval. After the second test procedure the frequency of bias towards the anchoring point exceeded the frequency of the opposite bias. This new secondly formed bias was accompanied by increase of the assurance level. Nonlinear correlation between assurance and anchoring levels was also found. These results suggest the presence of the cognitive dissonance after an anchoring effect influence.
M.B. Kuvaldina
Uncertainty reaction in different types of cognitive tasks
In Allakhverdovs theory (Allakhverdov, 2000, 2003) uncertainty reaction seems to be one of the main mechanisms of consciousness to defend its own hypothesis. In this connection, he formulated a generalized law: the more unexpected stimulus or response we have the more time consciousness devote to work with it. We set up the following hypothesis in our work:
Individual differences in reaction time on new or unexpected stimuli seem to be a stable characteristic (variable).
This individual characteristic is to be found in different types of cognitive tasks.
To verify this hypothesis the uncertainty reaction on dissimilar type of stimuli (color spots, geometric figures, and digits) & on different type of uncertainty (time, alternative) was observed.
The hypothesis under discussion was verified in 4 experiments in the task of choice reaction. The fifth experiment dealt with the task of categorization. Series varied in probability of stimulus appearance. The findings of each participant approximate to logarithmic curve quite well, & the factor of the slope was defined to be an individual sensitivity index of uncertainty changes. Results of experiments tend to verify the hypothesis partly: two groups that have a valid difference in degree of sensitivity index of uncertainty changes were marked on the basis of the first 4 experiments. Such results stay independently the type of stimulus & the type of uncertainty.
E.N. Ivanova
Recurring errors within the group decision making
The article is concerned with the research devoted to revealing cognitive mechanisms of group decision-making using model of conflict situation. The hypotheses of similarities of cognitive patterns identifying in group and individual processes was confirmed by its results. It was approved that disputants trend to support and repeat their initial hypotheses regardless of its truthfulness or falseness counteracting group leaders influence. This appeared that modification of decision-making circumstances, such as appearing new disputants, changing their role in the process lead to more obvious opinions dynamics and contribute to precipitation of correct problem solving.
|
|
|
., . . , - , - .
[email protected]
. . , , . , - .
[email protected]
6- - .
‑ - .
[email protected]
4- - .
[email protected]
- , - . .. .
[email protected]
. . , - , .
. . , , . - .
- .
. . , - .
5- - .
- .
- , - . .. .
4- - .
. . , - , .
- , - . .. .
1. . // . . / . . ., .. ., 1998.
2. .. . 2006 ( ).
3. .. . ., 2003.
|
|
|
4. .. // . ., 2004. 4-5.
5. .., .. . , 2005.
6. .., .. . 2006 ( ).
7. .. . . , 2002.
8. .., .. // . / . .. ., 1999.
9. .. ( ) // ( ). 2005. .2. 1. .4465.
10. .. // . . . / . .. . ., . 2005. .128130.
11. .. // . 2005. 2.
12. .. . ., 2003.
13. .. , , ? // ( ). 2004. .1. 4. .113125.
14. .. // . ., 2004. .6067.
15. . . . ., 1993.
16. . . . ., 2001.
17. .. . ., 2000.
18. .. // / . .. . ., 2004 . .209249.
19. .., .. // . ., 1999. 3.
20. .., .. -: // , . VI . ., 1983. . 1. .7273.
21. . . . ., 2002.
22. .. // 2005 . ., 2006 ( ).
23. . . .1 .2. , 18871888.
24. .. . .,1966.
25. .. , . ., 1911.
26. .. . ., 1966.
27. .. // . ., 2004. .189203.
28. . . ., 1977.
29. .., .., .. . ., 1980.
30. .. // . 1999. 4. .5874.
31. .. . .,1982.
32. .. // . . 1975.
33. .. // 2002 . ., 2003. c. 410.
34. .. // ―2004: ― 2004 / . .. , .. . ., 2004. c. 628629.
35. .. . . . . ., 1972.
|
|
|
36. . . . ., 1881.
37. .. . ., 1895.
38. ., . . ., 2004.
39. .. ( ) // . 2003 . ., 2004. . 4550.
40. .. . ., 1990.
41. ., ., . . ., 2001.
42. .., .. . ., 1994.
43. .. // . 1969. 5.
44. .. , , . ., 1982.
45. . . .,1913.
46. . ., . . . ., 1977.
47. .. , // . ., 2002.
48. .. . ., 2000.
49. .. // . . ., 2004.
50. .. . ., 1961.
51. .. . ., 2000.
52. .., .., .. // . , 1983. .362364.
53. .. . . (, 2000 .).
54. . . ., 1997.
55. . . . ., 2000.
56. .. . . . . ., 1986.
57. .. // . ., 1977.
58. . : // . . . 3. . ., 2004. .4860.
59. .. - // . / . .. , .. ., 1998.
60. . : // / . .. , .. .,1975. .96113.
61. .., .. // XXI : , . ., 2006 ( ).
62. .. // XXI : , . ., 2001. .2628.
63. . . ., 1975.
64. . . ( ). , 1903.
65. .. . ., 2000.
66. .., .. // . 1962. 6.
67. . . ., 2003.
|
|
|
68. .. . ( ). ., 1968.
69. .. - . ., 2003.
70. .. . , , , . ., 1996.
71. .. . . (, 2003 .).
72. .. . // . ., 1977.
73. . . // . . . , . . . IV. M.,1973.
74. . : ? // ., . . ., 2005.
75. .., .., .. // XXI : ― , . ., 2005. . 4950.
76. .. . . . . ., 2002.
77. .. . . . . ., 1992.
78. . . . . . 6 . ., 19511952.
79. .. // ―. , 1985 .6671.
80. .. . ., 1988.
81. .. ? ( ) // ( ). 2005. . 2. 1. . 93101.
82. .. . /., 1996.
83. . . // . 1996. 6. . 125131.
84. . . ., 2004.
85. . . . ., 1962.
86. . . ., 1998.
87. ./ . .. ., 1989.
88. . . ., 1985.
89. .. . ., 1967.
90. .. . .,1971.
91. .. (, , ). ., 2003.
92. . . .2. ., 2000.
93. . . . ., 1994.
94. / . .. , 1979.
95. .. // . , 1990. .133139.
96. .. // XV . : . ., 1985. .196198.
97. .. - // . . . . . 1. . 2. . , 2003.
98. .. : // . .3. , 1945. . 395426.
99. .., .., .. : . ., 1995.
100. . . ., 2003.
101. .. . ., 2002.
102. .., .., .. : . ., 2001.
103. .. . . (, 2004 .).
104. .. . ., 1969.
105. .. / . .5. , 1971. . 185190.
106. .. . ., 2002.
107. .. . ., 1997.
108. .. . ., 1978.
109. .. . ., 2002.
110. .. . ., 1978.
111. .. // . . .. . ., 1999.
112. . . ., 1999.
|
|
|
113. .. : // 2002 , 2003. . 119123.
114. .. // XXI : - , . ., 2005, . 6971.
115. . . ., 1990.
116. . . ., 1990.
117. . , .. // . 2004. 2. .178179.
118. ., . . ., 2004.
119. . // . . . 2. ., 1963.
120. .. .. . ., 2000.
121. ., . . ., 1997
122. ., . . ., 1998.
123. Adams J. K. Laboratory studies of behavior without awareness. // Psychological Bulletin. 1957. Vol. 54. p.383405.
124. Alluisi E. Interaction of S-T compatibility & the rate of gain of information // Perceptual & motor skills. 1965. Vol. 20 (3).
125. Alwin D.F., Krosnick J.A. The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement // Sociological Methods and Research. 1991. N 20. p. 139181.
126. Amoo T., Friedman H.H. Do numeric values influence subjects responses to rating scales? // Journal of international marketing and marketing research. 2001. N 26. p. 4146.
127. Anderson J.R., Bower G.H. Configural properties in sentence memory // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1972. N 11. p.594605.
128. Anderson M., Neely J. Interference and Inhibition in Memory Retrieval. 1996. p. 237313.
129. Balota D. A. Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1983. Vol. 22. p. 88104.
130. Basden B., Basden D. Directed Forgetting: Further Comparisons of the Item and List Methods // Memory. 1996. 4 (6). p. 633653.
131. Basden B., Basden D. Does RetrievalInduced Forgetting Underlie Directed Forgetting // Paper presented at ICOM 3. Valencia, Spain. July, 2001.
132. Basden B., Basden D., Gargano G. Directed Forgetting in Implicit and Explicit Memory Tests: A Comparison of Methods // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memo-ry and Cognition. 1993. Vol. 19. N 3. p. 114.
133. Bellezza F. S., Six L., Philips D. A mnemonic for remembering long strings of digits // Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1992. Vol. 30 (4). p. 271274.
134. Belson W.A. The effect of reversing the presentation order of verbal rating scales // Journal of Advertising Research. 1966. N 6 (4). p. 3037.
135. Bjork E., Bjork R., Anderson M. Varieties of GoalDirected Forgetting // Intentional Forgetting. Interdisciplinary approaches. / Ed. by J.M. Golding, C.M. MacLeod. Ch. 3. New Jersey. 1998. p. 103137.
136. Bjork P.A., de Winstanley E.L. Processing Instructions and the Generation Effect: A Test of the Multifactor Transferappropriate Processing Theory // Memory. 1997. Vol. 5. Issue 3. p. 401422.
137. Bjork R.A. Theoretical implications of directed forgetting // Coding processes in human memory. / Ed. by A.W Melton, E. Martin. Washington, 1972.
138. Bobrow S. A. & Bower G. H. Comprehension and recall of sentences // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969. 80. p. 455461.
139. Bower G.H., Karlin M.B., Dueck A. Comprehension and memory for pictures // Memory & Cognition. 1975. 3. p. 216220.
140. Braid J. Neurypnologie. Traite du sommeil nerveux ou hypnotisme. Paris, 1883.
141. Bruner J. Another look at New Look 1 // American Psychologist. 1992. Vol. 47. N 6. p. 780783.
142. Chapman G.B., Johnson E.J. Incorporating the Irrelevant. Ahchors in Judgment of Belief and Value // Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment / Ed. by T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman. 2002.
143. Chapman G.B., Johnson E.J. The limits of anchoring // Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 1994.7. p. 223242.
144. Charcot J.M. Physiologie pathologique. Sur les divers etats nerveux determines par l'hypnotisation chez les hysteriques. [Pathological physiology: On the various nervous states determined by the hypnotisation of hystericals]. Comptes rendus de l'Academie Des Sciences. 94.1882. p. 403405.
145. Cleeremans A. Principles for Implicit Learning // How implicit is implicit learning? / Ed. by D. Berry Oxford, 1997. p. 196234.
146. Davis L.W., Husband, R.W. A study of hypnotic susceptibility in relation to personality traits // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1931. 26. p. 175182.
147. De Winstanley, P.A., Bjork, E.L., Bjork, R.A. Generation Effects and the Lack Thereof: The Role of Transferappropriate Processing // Memory. 1996. Vol. 4. Issue 1. p. 3148.
148. Dienes Z., Altmann G. Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? // How implicit is implicit learning? / Ed. by D. Berry Oxford, 1997. p. 107123.
149. Dienes Z., Perner J. A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge // Behavioral and Brain Studies. 1999. Vol. 22. N 5. p. 735808.
150. Dulany D.E., Carlson A., Dewey G.I. A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1984. N 113. p. 541555.
151. Eich E. Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness // Memory & Cognition. 1984. Vol. 12. p. 105111.
152. Finke R., Bettle J. Chaotic Cognition: Principles and Application. New Jersey. 1996.
153. Friedman H.H., Friedman L.W., Gluck B. The effects of scalechecking styles on responses to a semantic differential scale // Journal of Market research society. 1988. N 30. p. 477481.
154. Friedman H.H., Herskovitz P.J., Pollack S. Biasing effects of scalechecking style in response to a Likert scale / Proceedings of the American statistical association annual conference: survey research methods. 1994. p. 792795.
155. Garner W.R. The Processing of Information and Structure. New-York, 1974.
156. Geiselman R.E., BjorkR.A., & FishmanD.L. Disrupted retrieval in directed forgetting: A link with posthypnotic amnesia // Journal of experimental psychology. General. 1983. 112. p. 5872.
157. Goolkasian P. The effect of size on the perception of ambiguous figures // Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 29. 1991. p. 161164.
158. Greenwald A.G. New Look 3: Unconscious Cognition Reclaimed // American Psychologist. 1992. Vol. 47. N 6. p. 766779.
159. Gruen D.W.R., Gizycki M.C. Explaining forward discount bias: is it anchoring? // Research Discussion Paper 9307. Economic Research Department Reserve Bank of Australia, 1993.
160. Hasher L., Zacks R., May C. Inhibitory control, Circadian Arousal, and Age // Attention and Performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of Performance: Interaction of theory and application. / Ed. by D. Gopher, A. Koriat Cambridge, 1999. p. 653675.
161. Hick W.E. On the rate of gain of information // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1952. 4. p. 1126.
162. Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1953. 45. p. 188196.
163. Izumi A. Absolute pitch in infant auditory learning: evidence for developmental reorganization // Journal of Acoustic Society of America. 2000. 108.
164. Jacoby L.L. Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1983. N 22. p. 485508.
165. Jacoby L.L., Lindsay D.S., Toth J.P. Unconscious Influences Revealed. Attention, Awareness, and Control // American Psychologist. 1992. Vol. 47, N 6. p. 802809.
166. Jacowitz K.E., Kahneman D. Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995. Vol. 21.
167. James L.A. The affect of symbols: towards the development of a cross-cultural graphic differential // International Journal of Symbology. 1969. N 1. p. 2852.
168. Jensen A.R., Rohwer W.D. The Stroop-color-word-test: A review //. Acta psychologica. 1966. Vol. 25. p. 3693.
169. Johnson H. Process of Successful intentional Forgetting //Psychological Bulletin. 1994. Vol. 116. N 2. p. 274292.
170. Kihlstrom J.F. The psychological unconscious // Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Ed. by L. Pervin. New York, 1990. p. 445464.
171. Kihlstrom J.F., Barnhardt T.M., Tataryn D.J. The Psychological Unconscious: Found, Lost, and Regained // American Psychologist. 1992. Vol. 47. N 6. p. 788791.
172. Klapp S.T., Hinkley L.B. The Negative Compatibility Effect: Unconscious Inhibition Influences Reaction Time and Response Selection // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2002. Vol. 131. N 2. p. 255269.
173. Klein, G.S. Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming // American Journal of Psychology. 1964. 77. p. 576588.
174. Kunst-Wilson W. R., Zajonc R. B. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science. 207. 1980. p. 557558.
175. Lewicki P., Hill T. & Czyzewska M. Nonconscious acquisition of information // American Psychologist. 1992. Vol. 47. N 6. p. 796801.
176. Lewicki P., Hill T. On the Status of Nonconscious Processes in Human Cognition: Comment on Reber // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1989. Vol. 118. N 3. p. 239241.
177. Lewicki P., Hill T., Sasaki I. Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases // Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 1989. 118. p. 323337.
178. Liebeault, A.A. Du sommeil et des etats analogues consideres surtout au point de vue de laction du moral sur le physique. Paris, 1866.
179. Lindley R., Bathurst K., Smith W., Wilson S. Hicks law, IQ & singularity or specifity of mind: A psychometric analysis // Personality & Individual Differences. 1993. Vol. 15(2).
180. Loftus E.F., Klinger M.R. Is the Unconscious Smart or Dumb? // American Psychologist. 1992. Vol. 47. N 6. p. 761765.
181. Longstreth L., Nabil El-Zahhar M. Exceptions to Hick's Law: Explorations With a Response Duration Measure // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1985. Vol. 114 (4).
182. MacLeod C.M. Long term recognition and recall following directed forgetting // Journal of experimental psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 1975. 104. p. 271279.
183. Macrae C.N. & MacLeod M.D. On Recollection Lost: When Practice make Imperfect // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. Vol. 77. N 3. p. 463473.
184. Marcel A.J. Selective effects of prior context on perception // Requin J. Anticipation and behavior. Paris, 1980. p. 412430.
185. Marks W., Dulaney C. Encoding Processes and Attentional Inhibition in Directed Forgetting // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 2001. November 27(6).
186. Mathews R.C. Abstractness of Implicit Grammar Knowledge: Comments on Perruchet and Pacteau's Analysis of Synthetic Grammar Learning // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1990. Vol. 119. N 4. p. 412416.
187. McCauley C., Parmelee C. M., Sperber C. D., & Carr, T. H. Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1980. 6. p. 265276.
188. Merikle P. M. & Joordens S. Measuring unconscious influences // Scientific Approaches to Consciousness. / Ed. by J. D. Cohen, J. W. Schooler. New Jersey, 1997.
189. Merikle P.M. & Reingold E.M. Recognition and lexical decision without detection: Unconscious perception? // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance. 1990. N 16. p. 574583.
190. Mesmer F.A. Aphorismes de M. Mesmer, Dictes a lAssemblee de ses Eleves, & Dans Lesquels on Trouve ses Principes, sa Theorie & les Moyens de Magnetizer. Rev 3rd ed. Paris, France: Compiegne, de lImprimerie de Bertrand, 1785.
191. Mulligan N. W. Generation and Memory for Contextual Detail // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 2004. Vol. 30.
192. Murphy S.T., Zajonc R.B. Affect, cognition and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993. Vol. 64. p.723739.
193. Mussweiler T. The Malleability of Anchoring Effects // Experimental Psychology. 2002. Vol. 49.
194. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. New York, 1967.
195. Neubauer A., Graz U. Intelligence & RT: A modified Hick Paradigm & a new RT paradigm //Intelligence. 1991. Vol. 15 (2).
196. Northcraft G. B. & Neale M. A. Experts, amateurs and real estate: An anchoring-andadjustment perspective on property pricing decisions // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1987. Vol. 39.
197. Osgood C., Suci C., Tannenbaum P. The measurement of meaning. Urbana University of Illinois press, 1957.
198. Palmer J. & Jonides J. Automatic Memory Search and the Effects of Information Load and Irrelevant Information // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1988. Vol. 14. Issue1. p. 136144.
199. Perruchet P., Vinter A. The self-organizing consciousness // Behavioral and Brain Studies. 2002. Vol. 25. N 3. . 297388.
200. Pettigrew T. F. The measurement and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable //Journal of Personality. 1958. Vol. 26.
201. Raz A., Shapiro T., Fan. J., Posner M.I. Hypnotic Suggestion and the Modulation of the Stroop Interference. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2002. 59. p.11551161.
202. Reber A.S. An Evolutionary Context for the Cognitive Unconscious // Philosophical Psychology. 1992. Vol. 5. N 1. p. 3351.
203. Reber A.S. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1989. Vol. 118. N 3. p. 219235.
204. Reber A.S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1967. N 6. p. 855863.
205. Reber A.S. On the Primacy of the Implicit: Comment on Perruchet and Pacteau // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1990. Vol. 119. N 3. p. 340342.
206. Regan J. Atomicity & learning: Effects of familiarity on naming letters // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception & performance. 1981. Vol. 7(1).
207. Roediger H.L., Tulving E. Exclusion of learned material from recall as a post retrieval operation // Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior. 1979. 18. p. 601615.
208. Salamon E. Mechanisms of knowledge learning and acquisition // Med Sci Monit. 2002. Vol. 8, N 7. p. 133139.
209. Schacter D.L. Implicit memory: History and current status // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1987. N 13. p. 501518.
210. Segall M. H., Campbell D. T., & Herskovits M. J. The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis, 1966.
211. Sergeant D., Roche S. Perceptual shifts in the auditory information processing of young children // Psychology of music. 1973. I.
212. Sheehan P. W., Donovan P., MacLeod C.M. Strategy manipulation and the Stroop effect in hypnosis // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1988. 97. p. 455460.
213. Simon H.A. Models of Man. New York, 1957.
214. Slamecka N. J. & Graf P. The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 1978. 4. p. 592604.
215. Smith T.W. An Analysis of Response Patterns to the Ten-Point Scalometer // GSS Methodological Report. 1992. N 76.
216. Strack F. & Mussweiler T. Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility // Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology. 1997. Vol. 73. p. 437446.
217. Stroh M. A., Shaw M., & Washburn M. F. A study of guessing // American Journal of Psychology. 1908. Vol. 19. p.243245.
218. Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1935. 18. p 643662.
219. Suzuki I. Directed Forgetting with Global Forget Instructions in an implicit and explicit Memory Test // Perceptual and motor skills. 2001. 92. p. 903909.
220. Suzuki I. Retrieval Inhibition and Consciousness State in Recollection // Tohoku Psychologica Folia. 1999. 58. p. 6977.
221. Treisman A.M. & Schmidt H. Illusory conjunction in the perception of objects // Cognitive Psychology. 1982. 14. p. 107141.
222. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases // Science. 1974. Vol. 185.
223. Ullsperger M. An Electrophysiological Test of Directed Forgetting: The Role of Retrieval Inhibition // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000. 12:6. p. 924940.
224. Ullsperger M. The role of retrieval inhibition in directed forgetting an event-related brain-analysis.// Dissertation, 2000.
225. Velichkovsky B.M., Pomplun M., Rieser H. Attention and communication. Visual attention and cognition. 1996.
226. Welford A. Comment on "Exceptions to Hick's Law: Explorations with a Response Duration Measure" (Longstreth, El Zahhar & Alcorn, 1985) // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1987. Vol. 116 (3).
227. Whetstone ., ross M.D. Control of Conscious Contents in Directed Forgetting and Thought Suppression // PSYCHE. 1998. 4(16).
228. Zajonc R.B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences // American Psychologist. 1980. N 35. p.151175.
[1] , , .
[2] . , , , . , . , , .
[3] : , (.: Finke, Bettle, 1996).
[4] , , , ., , . : , . , , , (, 2003, .106).
[5] . : , (. : , , 1994, .18).
[6] , , . , , , .
[7] , , , , . , , , , (, , ), .
[8] - , .
[9] : , , . , π.
* 05-06-80384- ( .. )
[10] . 1970 (, 1996).
[11] New Look 3: .. (Greenwald, 1992), , .
[12] .. 1974 .
[13] .. 1935 . 1938 . . Lipscomb (. ). , , . , , . : , . . 1 1973 . 76 .
[14] , , , , ..
* 06-06-00417- ( .. )
* 04-06-80090- ( .. )
* 04-06-00301- ( .. )
[15] , , , . , , , .
[16] .. , , .
[17] . , . , : ? , .
* 05-06-06034- ( .. )
* 06-06-00417- ( .. )
* 05-06-80384- ( .. )
* 06-06-00326- ( .. )
* 04-06-00301-
( .. )
[18] . .. . . , , . . . 1885 . . . 1934 . . . 1952 . . ( . ). , . .
* 05-06-80384-
( .. )
* 05-06-06317-ࠠ
( .. )
[19] , ( ). , . . (2004, .178 179) : .. , , - , .
[20] .. (1993) , , , .
