.


:




:

































 

 

 

 





, . , 31, 32. .

(, , , , . 6.1 6.2) , . , (, , , ..) , , , (). , . 11000 33. , , . (. 6.3) - , . 28000 . , 21 . . , -

 

 

. 6.1. . ; ; ; () () . , .*

"(a) Berne and Levy, p. 143 (note 63); (b) Dawkins, p. 16 (note 13); (c) Newell, p29 (note 45a); (d) Snell RS, Lemp MA. 1989. Clinical anatomy of the eye. Boston, Oxford, and London: Blackwell Dcientific Publications, p. 163; (e) Young (note 58).

 

per , 40 , . 2, 4 . , .

(, ), ( , . 6.3) . . , . , . 34.

, , . . . , ,

. 6.2. . , , *.

'Newell, p. 38 (note 45a).

 

 

. 6.3. *.

'Raven and Johnson, p. 831 (note 28a).. -

. . , , , . (. 6.1), . , . , , . , , , , , , -. 35.

36, , , 37. , , 38. , , , , , , , , .

39 . , , , , , , . 40 , . , , , . , . . . , , , , , . . , , .

. , - . , , . , , , , 65 41. , , 42. , , , , . , , , , . 5000 43. , . , . - : , - . [] , . ; [], , , [ ]44.

.

, , (. . 6.1), , 45. 100 : . , . , , (. 6.1 ). , , . . , .

, , (. 6.1 , ). 30 . , , . 1, 2 , . , , .

, , . , , , . . , : 1) , ; 2) , , , ; 3) , . . , , , , , , . , . , , , 46.

, . , 47, , , 48.

, , , (. 6.2). 49, , , . , , , , , , , .

. (. 6.2), . , , , . , ? . , , , ? , , ? , . , . , . , , .

. (. . 1 , ), , . , , , 50. , . , , , . , , 51. , , , . , , . . , . , ; , . , , , , , , , 52. , , . . , , .

, , ? . , , ? . , ( ), , 53.

 

 

?

, . , , , , () . . 6.1 - ( ), () , . , . , . , - 54. , , , , 55. : ?..56

. , (. 6.1 ) , , , (. 6.1 ).

. 57. , (. 6.1 ). , . , . - 8090 58. , 100 . ( , , .)59 , 60. -, . , . , 61. , , 62. , - , , , . 10 , ? , (. 6.1 ) . , . , , , . (. 6.1). , . , ( ), .

, , , ? , . , , : , - ?

,

. .

, . , . , , , . , . , , , . , , , , . , , , , . , , 63. .

, 64. ? , , , , . , . , , ? 65. , , . , , . () . , , - .

. , 15 . . -, , . , , 200 000 , 66. (), , . , , 67, , . , , , , , .

. , , , , , . , - . 12 , , 12 , , 68.

, , , . 50000 200000 , , , . ? , , . , , , - , .

, . , . , . . , , , . , , , , . , , , , , . .

1. Bacon F. 1605. The advancement of learning. Book II, Chapter VI, section 1. Reprinted in: 1936. The World's Classics, vol. 93: Bacon's Advancement of Learning and The New Atlantis, London, New York, and Toronto: Henry Frowde, Oxford University Press, p. 96.

2. .: (a) Clark RED. 1961. The universe: plan or accident? The religious implications of modem science. Philadelphia: Muhlenberg Press, pp. 15-151; (b) Templeton JM. 1995. The humble approach: scientists discover God. Rev. ed. New York: Continuum Pub. Co.

3. .: Boslough J. 1985. Stephen Hawking's universe. New York: William Morrow and Co., p. 121.

4. Davies PCW. 1982. The accidental universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88-93.

5. Hawking SW. 1988. A brief history of time: from the big bang to black holes. Toronto,

New York, and London: Bantam Books, pp. 121,122.

- 6. Carr BJ, Rees MJ. 1979. The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world. Nature 278:605-612.

7. .: a) Leslie J. 1988. How to draw conclusions from a fine-tuned cosmos. In: Russell RJ, Stoeger WR, Coyne GV, editors. Physics, philosophy, and theology: a common quest for understanding. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory, pp. 297-311. . : b) Barrow JD, Tipler FJ. 1986. The anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford: Clarendon Press, and New York: Oxford University Press; c) Carr and Rees (note 6); d) Davies P. 1994. The unreasonable effectiveness of science. In: Templeton JM, editor. Evidence of purpose: scientists discover the Creator. New York: Continuum Pub. Co., pp. 44-56; e) de Groot M. 1992. Cosmology and Genesis: the road to harmony and the need for cosmological alternatives. Origins 19:8-32; f) Gale G. 1981. The anthropic principle. Scientific American 245:154-171; g) Polkinghorne J. 1994. A potent universe. In: Templeton, pp. 105-115 (note 7d); h) Ross H. 1993. The Creator and the cosmos. Colorado Springs, Colo.: NavPress, pp. 105-135.

8. Barbour IG. 1990. Religion in an age of science. The Gifford Lectures 1989-1991, vol. 1. San Francisco: Harper and Row, p. 135.

9. .: a) Davies P. 1988. The cosmic blueprint: new discoveries in nature's creative ability to order the universe. New York: Simon and Schuster. - , (. 203). .: b) Waldrop MM. 1992. Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York and London: Touchstone Books, Simon and Schuster; ) . 8- .

10. , : ) Barbour 1G. 1966. Issues in science and religion. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 53,132; b) Barbour, pp. 24-26 (note 8); c) Beerbower JR. 1968. Search for the past: an introduction to paleontology. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 175,176; d)BynumWF, BrowneEJ, Porter R, editors. 1981. Dictionary of the history of science. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 123,296,415, 416, 439, 440; e) Grasse P-P. 1977. Evolution of living organisms: evidence for a new theory of transformation. Carlson BM, Castro R, translators. Mew York, San Francisco, and London: Academic Press, pp. 240-242. Translation of: L'Evolution du Vivant; f) Mayr E. 1970. Populations, species, and evolution: an abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution. Rev. ed. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 351; g) Rensch B. 1959. Evolution above the species level. [Altevogt DR, translator]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 57, 58. Translation of the 2nd ed. of: Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre; h) Simpson GG. 1967. The meaning of evolution: a study of the history of life and of its significance for man. Rev. ed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. 174,175; i) Simpson GG. 1964. This view of life: the world of an evolutionist. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, pp. 22,144,273.

11. .: a) Baldwin JT. 1992. God and the world: William Paley's argument from perfection traditiona continuing influence. Harvard Theological Review 85(1): 109-120; b) Barbour 1966, pp. 19-91,132-134,386-394 (note ); ) Barbour 1990, pp. 24-30 (note 8); d) Kenny A. 1987. Reason and religion: essays in philosophical theology. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell, pp. 69-84.

12. Tweyman S, editor. 1991. David Hume: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion in focus. Routledge Philosophers in Focus Series. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 95-185.

13. DawkinsR. 1986. The blind watchmaker. New York and London: W.W. Norton and Co.,p,6.

14. Baldwin (note 11 a).

15. Paley W. 1807. Natural theology; or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity. 11th ed. London: R. Faulder and Son, pp. 1-8,20-46,193-199.

16. Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. In: Burrow J, editor. 1968 reprint. London and New York: Penguin Books, p. 217.

17. Himmelfarb G. 1967. Darwin and the Darwinian revolution. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith, p. 338.

18. Peckham M, editor. 1959. The origin of species by Charles Darwin: a variorum text. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, p. 759.

19. Himmelfarb, p. 347 (note 17).

20. -. .: Plantinga A. 1991. When faith and reason clash: evolution and the Bible. Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):8-32.

21. 7.

22. Dawkins, pp. 5,6 (note 13).

23. Rensch, p. 58 (note lOg).

24. Mayrl970,p.351 (note 10f).

25. Grasse, pp. 103, 104 (note ).

26. Block HM, editor. 1956. Candide and other writings by Voltaire. New York: Modern Library, Random House, p. 111.

27. Fentress JC. 1967. Discussion of Q. Wald's The problems of vicarious selection. In: Moorhead PS, Kaplan MM, editors. Mathematical challenges to the neo-Darwinian interpretation of evolution. The Wistar Institute Symposium Monograph No. 5. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press, p. 71.

28. : a) Raven PH, Johnson QB. 1992. Biology. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Boston, and London: Mosby-Year Book, p. 14;b) DiamondJ. 1985. Voyage of the overloaded ark. Discover (June), pp. 82-92; c) Committee on Science and Creationism, National Academy of Sciences. 1984. Science and creationism: a view from the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

29. . 8- .

30. a) Avers CJ. 1989. Process and pattern in evolution. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 139,140; b) Carrol 1 SB. 1995. Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates. Nature 376:479-485; c) De Robertis EM, Oliver G, Wright CVE. 1990. Homeobox genes and the vertebrate body plan. Scientific American (July), pp. 46-52; d) Gehring WJ, 1987. Homeo boxes in the study of development. Science 236:1245-1252; e) Schneuwiy S, Klemenz R, Gehring WJ. 1987. Redesigning the body plan of Drosophlla by ectopic expression of the homeotic gene Antennapedia. Nature 325:816-818.

31. a) Dawkins R. 1994. The eye in a twinkling. Nature 368:690,691; b) Nilsson D-E, Pelger S. 1994. A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 256:53-58. , , 400000 . , , . , , , , . , . , , .

32. a) Baldwin JT. 1995. The argument from sufficient initial system organization as a continuing challenge to the Darwinian rate and method of transitional evolution. Christian Scholar's Review 14(4):423-443; b) Grasse, p. 104 (note ).

33. Duke-Elder S. 1958. The eye in evolution. In: Duke-Elder S, editor. System of ophthalmology, vol. 1. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., p. 192.

34. a) Clarkson ENK, Levi-Setti R. 1975. Trilobite eyes and the optics of Des Cartes and Huygens. Nature 254:663-667; b) Towe KM. 1973. Trilobite eyes: calcified lenses in vivo. Science 179:1007-1009.

35. Gregory RL, Ross HE, Moray N. 1964. The curious eye of Copllla. Nature 201:1166-1168.

36. a) Cronly-Dillon JR. 1991. Origin of invertebrate and vertebrate eyes. In: Cronly-Dillon JR, Gregory RL, editors. Evolution of the eye and visual system. Vision and visual dysfunction, vol. 2. Boca Raton, Ra., Ann Arbor, Mich., and Boston: CRC Press, pp. 15-51; b) Duke-Elder (note 33); c) Land MF. 1981. Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H, editor. Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. : Invertebrate visual centers and behavior 1. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VI1/6B. Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 471-594.

37. Grasse, p. 105 (note l0e).

38. Darwin C. 1872. The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 6th ed. New York: Mentor Books, New American Library, pp. 168-171.

39. Simpson, pp. 168-175 (note 1 Oh).

40. Dawkins, pp. 15-18 (note 13).

41. a) Salvini-Plawen LV, Mayr E. 1977. On the evolution of photoreceptors and eyes. Evolutionary Biology 10:207-263. b) Land (note ) , , (. 543).

42. a)GouldSJ. 1994. Common pathways of illumination. Natural History 103(12): 10-20; b) Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter U, Gehring WJ. 1994. Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science 265:785-789; c) Zuker CS. 1994. On the evolution of the eyes; would you like it simple or compound? Science 265:742, 743.

43. MestelR. 1996. Secretsinafly'seye. Discover 17(7):106-114.

44. Duke-Elder, p. 178 (note 33).

45. : a) Newell FW. 1992. Ophthalmology: principles and concepts. 7th ed. St. Louis, Boston, and London: Mosby-Year Book, pp. 3-98. : b) Lumsden RD. 1994. Not so blind a watchmaker. Creation Research Society Quarterly 31:13-22.

46. Davson H. 1990, Physiology of the eye. 5th ed. New York, Oxford, and Sydney: Pergamon Press, pp. 758, 759.

47. , .777,778.

48. Kaufman PL. 1992. Accommodation and presbyopia: neuromuscular and biophysical aspect. In: Hart WM, Jr., editor. 1992. Adier's physiology of the eye: clinical application. 9th ed. St. Louis, Boston, and London: Mosby-Year Book, pp. 391-411.

49. : a) Davson, pp. 647-666 (note 46); b) Duke-Elder S, Wybar . 1961. The anatomy of the visual system. In: Duke-Elder S, editor. System of ophthalmology, vol. 2. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., pp. 414-427; c) Hubel DH. 1988. Eye, brain, and vision. Scientific American Library Series, No. 22. New York and Oxford: W. H. Freeman and Co., pp. 78-81; d) Warwick R, reviser. 1976. Eugene Wolff s anatomy of the eye and orbit. 7th ed. Philadelphia and Toronto: W. B. Saunders Co., pp. 261-265.

50. .: a) Gregory RL. 1991. Origins of eyeswith speculations on scanning eyes. In: Cronly-Dillon and Gregory, pp. 52-59 (note 36a); b) Grbsser O-J, Landis T. 1991. Visual agnosias and other disturbances of visual perception and cognition. Vision and visual dysfunction, vol. 12. Boca Raton, Fla., Ann Arbor, Mich., and Boston: CRC Press, pp. 1-24; c) Spillmann L, Wemer JS, editors. 1990. Visual perception: the neurophysiological foundations. San Diego, New York, and London: Academic Press.

51. Lennie P, Trevarthen C, Van Essen D, Wassle H. 1990. Parallel processing of visual information. In: Spillmann and Werner, pp. 103-128 (note 50c).;

52. Shapley R, lli, Grossberg S, Morgan M, Rentschler 1.1990. Computational theories of visual perception. In: Spillmann and Wemer, pp. 417-448 (note 50c).

53. .: Hoyle F, Wickramasinghe NC. 1981. Evolution from space: a theory of cosmic creationism. Hew York: Simon and Schuster, pp. 96,97.

54. Williams GC. 1992. Natural selection: domains, levels, and challenges. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 73.

55. Diamond (note 28b).

56. Thwaites WM. 1983. An answer to Dr. Geislerfrom the perspective of biology.

Creation/Evolution 13:13-20.

57. , , . .: Steinberg RH, Wood I, Hogan M). 1977. Pigment epithelial en-sheathment and phagocytosis of extrafoveal cones in human retina. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 277:459-471.

58. Young RW. 1971. The renewal of rod and cone outer segments in the rhesus monkey, journal of Cell Biology 49:303-318.

59. Leblond CP, Walker BE. 1956. Renewal of cell populations. Physiological Reviews

36:255-276.

60. Young RW. 1976. Visual cells and the concept of renewal. Investigative

Ophthalmology 15:700-725.

61. a) Bok D, Hall MO. 1971. The role of the pigment epithelium in the etiology of inherited retinal dystrophy in the rat. Journal of Cell-Biology 49:664-682. - .: b) Ayoub G. 1996. On the design of the vertebrate retina. Origins and Design 17(1): 19-22.

62. a) Bok D. 1994. Retinal photoreceptor disc shedding and pigment epithelium phagocytosis. In: Ogden , editor. Retina. 2nd ed. Vol. 1: Basic science and inherited retinal disease. St. Louis, Baltimore, Boston, and London: Mosby, pp. 81 -94; b) Newell, pp. 304,305 (note 45a).

63. Beme RM, Levy MN, editors. 1993. Physiology. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Boston, and London: Mosby-Year Book, pp. 851-875.

64. a) Eldredge N. 1995. Reinventing Darwin: the great debate at the high table of evolutionary theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 215-219; b) Halvorson HO, Monroy A, editors. 1985. The origin and evolution of sex. New York: Alan R. Liss; c) Margulis L, Sagan D. 1986. Origins of sex: three billion years of genetic recombination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press; d) Maynard Smith J. 1988. Did Darwin get it right? Essays on games, sex, and evolution. New York and London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 98-104,165-179,185-188.

65. Bell G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, p. 19.

66. Berne and Levy, pp. 166-188 (note 63).

67. a) Dawkins 1986, pp. 22-41 (note 13); b) Griffin DR. 1986. Listening in the dark: the acoustic orientation of bats and men. Ithaca and London: Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press.

68. a) Behe MJ. 1996. Darwin's black box. New York: Free Press, pp. 77-97; (b) Berne and Levy, pp. 339-357 (note 63).

 

 





:


: 2015-08-18; !; : 567 |


:

:

.
==> ...

808 - | 690 -


© 2015-2024 lektsii.org - -

: 0.082 .