1. . .
2. , , . ) , ) ) .
3. , , .
4. , , ; , .
. ,
5. .
6. ,
7. () , , . .
8. . , , , , , .
9. , , . , , , , -, .
10. ( , , , ) (Krasner, 1983, . 3).
. ,
11. , . , .
12. , , .
|
|
Ashley R. The poverty of neo- realism // Keohane. Op. cit. 1986. P. 255-300.
Axelrod R. Conflict of interest. Chicago: Markham, 1970.
Axelrod R., Keohane R.O. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions // Baldwin. Op. cit. 1993a. P. 85-115.
Baldwin D.A. (ed.). Neo-realism and neo-liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993a.
Baldwin D.A. (ed.). Neo-liberalism, neo-realism and world politics. 1993A. // Baldwin. Op. cit. 1993a. P. 3-28.
Bull H. The anarchical society. London: Macmillan, 1977.
Butferfield H. Christianity and history. London: Collins, 1958.
Buzan B. People, states and fear. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1991.
Campbell D. Writing security. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992.
CarrE.H. The twenty years' crisis, 1919-1939. London: Macmillan, 1946.
Enloe C. Margins, silences and bottom rungs: How to overcome the estimation of power in the study of international politics / Paper presented to the conference on After Positivism: Theory and Method in World Politics. University of Wales. Aberystwyth, July 1-3.1994.
GaltungJ. A structural theory of aggression // Journal of Peace Research. 1964. Vol. 1. P. 95119.
Grieco J.M. Anarchy and the limits of co-operation: A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. 1993a // Baldwin. Op. cit. 1993a. P. 116-140.
Grieco J.M. Understanding the problem of international co-operation: The limits ofneoliberal mstitutionalism and the future of realist theory. 19936// Baldwin. Op. cit. 1993a. P. 301-338.
Hanson N.R. Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1958.
Hobbes T. Leviathan/Ed. byJ. Plamenatz. London: Fontana, 1962; originally published 1651. [ . // . . 2- . . 2. .: , 1991. . 3-535.]
Hollis M., Smith S. Explanation and understanding in international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
Krasner S.D. (ed.). International regimes. Ithaca (N.Y.): Comell University Press, 1983.
Keohane R. 0. (ed.). Neo-realism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
Keohane R. 0. Institutional theory and the realist challenge after the cold war // Baldwin. 1993a. P. 269-300.
Krasner S.D. Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier // Baldwin. Op. cit. 1993a. P. 234-249.
Lakatos I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes // Criticism and the growth of knowledge / Ed. by I. Lakatos, A.E. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. P. 91-196.
Morgenthau H.J. Politics among nations. New York: Knopf, 1967.
Peterson V.S. (ed.). Feminist revisions of international relations theory. London: Lynne Reiner, 1992.
Powell R. Absolute and relative gains in international relations theory // Baldwin. Op. cit. 1993a. P. 209-233.
Putnam R.D. Diplomatic and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games // International Organisation. 1988. Vol. 42. P. 427-461.
Rasmussen E. Gains and information. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989. Snidal D. Relative gains and the pattern of international co-operation // Baldwin. Op. cit. 1993a. P. 170-208.
Snyder G.H. Prisoners' dilemma and chicken models in international relations // International Studies Quarterly. 1971. Vol. 15. P. 66-103.
|
|
Spegele R.D. Alarums and excursions: The state of the discipline in international relations //
Politickon (South Africa). 1983. Vol. 10. P. 51-72.
Waltz. K.N. Theory of international politics. Reading (Mass.): Addison-Wesley, 1979.
Ward H. Game theory and the politics of the global commons // Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1993. Vol. 37. P. 203-235.
18