, BPAQ (. 3).
, , BPAQ , . , , . 3 . , BPAQ: .
. , . [4, . 29], :
, ;
, ;
, , , , , .
. 120
BPAQ, - [5], [6].
- - . BPAQ . , 714 ., , - . , 149 , , - .
:
1. "" BPAQ "" "" -;
2. " " BPAQ "" - "";
|
|
3. "" BPAQ "" - "";
4. " " BPAQ - .
"" "" [32], [19], [16], (.477) (.433). , "", " " BPAQ, (. 4).
"" "" "" "" "". "" - "" - , , , . "" "" BDHI - [22]. . . [12] "" - "" BPAQ.
, BPAQ "" (. 4).
. , - , " ", "" "" (. 5).
, , , <. 05. -
4. BPAQ, -
"" BPAQ | " " BPAQ | "" BPAQ | |
"" () | All | .169 | .344 |
=.000 | =. 036 | =.000 | |
"" (-) | .299 | .443 | .266 |
=.000 | =. 000 | =001 | |
"" | .394 | .225 | .539 |
(-) | =. 000 | =. 005 | =. 000 |
"" (-) | .215 | .196 | .374 |
=. 008 | =.015 | =.000 | |
"" (-) | .070 | .107 | .289 |
=. 385 | =.180 | =.000 |
-----
. 200 . (100 100 ), .
5. BPAQ
Z | p | |||
N 2 | N 1 | |||
" " | M = 29.59 | M = 26.49 | 2.11 | 0.00 |
SD = 7.02 | SD = 6.22 | |||
"" | M = 22.96 | M = 20.29 | 1.59 | 0.01 |
SD = 5.11 | SD = 5.67 | |||
"" | M = 24.93 | M = 22.08 | 1.98 | 0.00 |
SD = 6.09 | SD = 5.21 |
-----
|
|
. N 2 - -, 92 . 18 - 50 , - ; N 1 - , 424 . 18 - 25 , . Z - -.
. 121
6. BPAQ
Z | p | |||
N 2 | N 1 | |||
" " | M = 24.54 | M = 21.53 | 1.43 | 0.03 |
SD = 7.22 | SD = 6.49 | |||
"" | M = 20.95 | M = 22.62 | 0.93 | 0.35 |
SD = 6.53 | SD = 5.66 | |||
"" | M = 24.97 | M = 22.81 | 1.39 | 0.04 |
SD = 6.38 | SD = 5.66 |
-----
. N 2 - -, 57 . 18 - 27 , - ; N 1 - , 290 . 18 - 25 , . Z- -.
7. BPAQ
"" | "" | |
" | r =.30 | r =.24 |
" | =. 00 | p =.00 |
"" | - | r =.44 |
p =.00 |
8. , BPAQ
Z | p | |||
" " | M = 26.49 SD = 6.22 | M = 21.53 SD = 6.49 | 4.87 | 0.00 |
"" | M = 20.29 SD = 5.67 | M = 22.62 SD = 5.66 | 2.03 | 0.00 |
"" | M = 22.08 SD = 5.21 | M = 22.81 SD = 5.66 | 1.10 | 0.18 |
M = 68.85 SD = 13.15 | M = 66.97 SD = 13.44 | 1.24 | 0.09 |
" " "". , "" , , (. . 6). , "", , , , , .
, BPAQ. .
. . 50 . (30 20 ) , 2002 ., BPAQ. , , 40 . (20 20 ). r : " " 0.79 - 0.77; "" 0.81 - 0.82; "" 0.84 - 0.82; , 24 0.85 - 0.83.
, (714 .), : " " - 0.77; "" - 0.79; "" - 0.69; - 0.81.
BPAQ.
|
|
. , , (. 7).
. (290 .) (424 .) BPAQ. (. . 8). " ", , BPAQ [9, 16, 27, 30, 31, 33] [20, 25]. , [7, 9, 17, 18, 30].
, . , .
, , . , 100 , -
. 122
[34, 13]. , , , - [33]. "" (. . 8), : (M = 20.2; SD = 6.3) [16]; (M = 17.6; SD = 6.1) [31]; (M = 18.6; SD = 5.6) [30]. . [21], (M = 23.28; SD = 6.57), .
, , , , , , , , BPAQ [29].
BPAQ , .
: - " "; , , - ""; , , - "". - .
, , , . - .
|
|
1. . . - // . . .: , 1990. . 6 - 11.
2. . . // . , 1979. . 100 - 110.
3. . . // . ., 1976. . 83 - 114.
4. . / . . . . : ., 1994.
5. . . . ., 1998.
6. . . . . , - , 2005 // http://aggressive-behavior.nar-od.ru/
7. Archer J., Haigh A. Beliefs about aggression among male and female prisoners // Aggressive Behavior. 1997. V. 23. P. 405 - 415.
8. Archer J., Holloway R., McLoughlin K. Self-reported physical aggression among young men // Aggressive Behavior. 1995. V. 21. P. 325 - 342.
9. Archer J., Kilpatrick G., Bramwell R. Comparison of two aggression inventories // Aggressive Behavior. 1995. V. 21. P. 371 - 380.
10. Bendig A. W. Factor analytic scales of covert and overt hostility // Journ. of Consulting Psychology. 1962. V. 26. P. 200.
11. Bernstein I. H., Gesn P. R. On the dimensionality of the Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire // Behavior Research and Therapy. 1997. V. 35. P. 563 - 568.
12. Bryant F. B., Smith B. D. Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire // Journ. of Research in Personality. 2001. V. 35. P. 138 - 167.
13. Burbank V. Female aggression in cross-cultural perspective // Behavior Science Research. 1987. V. 21. P. 70 - 100.
14. Bushman B. J., Cooper H. M., Lemke K. M. Meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration using the Buss-Durkee hostility inventory // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1991. V. 17. P. 344 - 349.
15. Buss A. F., Durkee A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility // Journ. of Consulting Psychology. 1957. V. 21. P. 343 - 349.
16. Buss A. H., Perry M. The Aggression Questionnaire // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992. V. 63. P. 452 - 459.
. 123
17. Campbell A., Muncer S., Gorman B. Gender and social representation of aggression: a communal-agenetic analysis // Aggressive Behavior. 1993. V. 19. P. 95 - 108.
18. Campbell A., Muncer S., Coyle E. Social representations of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: a preliminary study // Aggressive Behavior. 1992. V. 18. P. 95 - 108.
19. Cook W. W., Medley D. M. Proposed hostility Pharisaic virtue scales for the MMPI // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 1954. V. 38. P. 414 - 418.
20. Eagly A. H., Steffen V. Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature // Psychological Bulletin. 1986. V. 100. P. 309 - 330.
21. Fossati A., Maffei C, Acquarini E., Di Ceglie A. Multigroup Confirmatory Component and Factor Analyses of the Italian Version of the Aggression Questionnaire // European Journ. of Psychological Assessment. 2003. V. 19(1). P. 54 - 65.
22. Han K., Weed N. C, Calhoun R. E., Butcher J. N. Psychometric characteristics of the MMPI-2 Cook-Medley Hostility Scale // Journ. of Personality Assessment. 1995. V. 65(3). P. 567 - 585.
23. Harris J. A. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Aggression Questionnaire // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1995. V. 33. P. 991 - 993.
24. Hu L., Bender P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in co-variance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives // Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999. V. 6. P. 1 - 55.
25. Hyde J. S. How large are gender differences in aggression: a developmental meta-analysis // Developmental Psychology. 1984. V. 20. P. 722 - 736.
26. Lange A., Dehghani B., De Beurs E. Validation of the Dutch adaptation of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1995. V. 33. P. 229 - 233.
|
|
27. Lovas L., Trenkova S. Aggression perception of an incident // Studia Psychologia. 1996. V. 38. P. 265 - 270.
28. Maiuro R. D., Cahn T. S., Vitaliano P. P. et al. Anger, hostility, and depression in domestically violent versus generally assaultive men and nonviolent control subjects // Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988. V. 56. P. 17 - 23.
29. Meesters C. M., Muris P., Backus I. Dimensions of hostility and myocardial infraction in adult males //Journ. of Psychosomatic Research. 1996. V. 40. P. 21 - 28.
30. Meesters C., Muris P., Bosma H. et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Aggression Questionnaire // Behavior Research and Therapy. 1996. V. 34. P. 839 - 843.
31. Nakano K. Psychometric evaluation on the Japanese adaptation of the aggression questionnaire // Behavior Research and Therapy. 2000. V. 39. P. 853 - 858.
32. Novaco R. W. Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. Lexington, KY: Lexington, 1975.
33. Ramirez J., Andreu J. M., Fujihara T. Cultural sex differences in aggression: A comparison between Japanese and Spanish students using two different inventories // Aggressive Behavior. 2001. V. 27. P. 313 - 322.
34. Rohner R. P. Sex differences in aggression: phylogenetic and exculturation perspectives // Ethos. 1976. V. 4. P. 57 - 72.
35. Vigil-Colet A., Lorenzo-Seva U., Codorniu-Raga M. J., Morales F. Factor Structure of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire in Different Samples and Languages // Aggressive Behavior. 2005. V. 31. P. 601 - 608.
36. Williams T. Y., Boyd J. C., Cascardi MA., Poythress N. Factor Structure and Convergent Validity of the Aggression Questionnaire in an Offender Population // Psychological Assessment. 1996. V. 8 (4). P. 398 - 403.