N. A. Zhuravleva
PhD, research assistant, Psychological Institute of RAS, Moscow
The results of decennial (1994 - 2003 years) study of values orientation dynamics of students in conditions of social and economic changes in Russia in the late 90-th of the 20-th century and at the beginning of the 21-st century are presented. The comparative analysis of values orientation structures of senior schoolboys/girls and students in the periods just after sharp socio-economic crisis (after 1992 - 93ys - 1994 y. "shear" and after 1998- 1999y. "shear") and in the periods of relative socio-economic living conditions stabilization (1997, 2001 and 2003 years) was carried out.
Key words: values orientation, terminal values, instrumental values, social and economic changes, socio-economic crisis.
. 44
.
: . .
. .
, , . , --
. , , ; , ; -. , , ; .
: , , , .
. 44
[3, 6, 23, 26] , , , , , , [12]. , .
XIX [30], . [20], . [28]. . , , , .
|
|
1950 - 1960- . , 1970 - 80- . [21]. , , , , . [7].
, , . -, , " , " [25, . 45]. , [15]. . [12]. -, . , , . , , .
, , . , - [8,9], , .
, , , .
, .
, : ; - ; [3]. - [5]; - - [19], [24, 25, 31, 32, 33], (- [6] - [3]); - , , [4].
|
|
, , . , , - [31, 32], -
. 45
, [33], , ( ) ( ) [24, 25].
[11, 12, 17, 28, 34, 35, 36]. , 1980- . . , . . [34], [11, 15, 17, 18, 22, 29]. " , / " [14, . 213]. , : a) GI - ( , , , ) ATG - ( ); ) - ( , , ) S - ( - ) [12, 13, 14, 34]. : (GI-T), (GI-S), (ATG-T), (ATG-S). (Group Environment Questionnaire, GEQ) [34].
: -, "-", "-"; -, - (GI and ATG) (ATG) ; -, ; -, , ( , .).
, ( ), , () [6]. , . , , , , - . , / , . , , .
|
|
[12]. , - , .
, , . , . ( , , ) , - (, , ) - . , , .
, ("--
. 46
"), ("-"). , , . . , , , , . , - , , (, , , ). . , , , , .. , [8, 9] (, , ), . . , - .
-, , ( , ) , . (- ), (S- ). ( ), ( ) ( ) - .
|
|
, :
* , , , ;
* , , , ; ("" , , , ) , ("" , , , ) - , ;
* , , ;
* (, , , , ), .
, :
* , , , , , ( , , );
* , , , , , ;
* ( , , , ).
S- , .
1. . (, / , / -) .
, . , , , , , -
. 47
. , "-" "-". , . , , , , . , .
2. . , (, / , / -), , . , "-", "- ".
, , . , , , , [1]. , , , . ( ) : , // ( ), /// ( ), / ( ).
|
|
, . , . .
3. . ( ) , - , . , ; (/ ); . : ) (-); ) (-); ) (-).
-, [8].
-, , - .
-, . , (, ) , - . .
-, , . , (, ) , - . , () .
. 48
, , . .
, , [8].
:
1) - ;
2) ( - ).
:
- , ;
- - .
, 136 . 69 , - () . , ( , , ), ( ), . 3379 , - 2142, - 91.
: () - (). . , . ( 53% ).
.
1. ( ) ("" ) [2]. , , , .. : ( ) ( ). , , , : " , , ". .
, "" , :
= 2Σ (Σ Aij)/N(N-1)). (1)
0 1.
2. " " [9]. 33 , (, , ). , -
. 49
( ) :
Nij c - i - j - ; Nij hc - i- j - ( ); N - ( , "" ), .
K -1 1. . :
0 1.
3. " - " [9, 10]. - : ) ( ) , "" ; ) ( "" , ) , , "" , "" .
, - . , , , , , . ( , , , , , .) , , , .
1.
( ) , "" .
1. , 0.03 0.33, 0.11 0.19. 0.33 1. (82%) - 0.8 1, (10.1%) 0.5 0.8, (7.9%) 0.33 - 0.5.
, , - . . , 15 , 0.11, . , , , , . , . . , , 1. , (0.11), - (1).
, "" , . - .
. 50
, , , "" .
2. , 0.25 - 0.55, 0.3 - 0.45. : 0.17 1, . , , , 83% .
, "" , . , , "" , 88% .
, , "" , , . , , . , , , ( ). - - ( ). . ( , , .) , , , . , , , .
, , - , " .
2.
, . , . - .
, , . -, () .
-, . , ( = 4.8), - ( =4.1), - ( = 3.3) - ( = 2.5). , , . , .
-, "" , . / . , 50% . , .
, 57% , 48% - . 46% 41% - . (
. 51
, , .) , .
, . , 15 0.17, . , , , , . , .. . , 1. , . , . . , . , , .
, / , / - . , , , . , . , () ( ) , . .
1. . . ( ) // . .: , 1977. . 64 - 67.
2. . ., . . : . /: , 1996.
3. . . . .: , 1979.
4. ., . . // . / . . . , . . , . . . .: , 1984. . 61 - 81.
5. . . : . .: . , 2001.
6. / . . . . .: , 1979.
7. . . " " " " // . 2005. N 2. . 58 - 67.
8. . . : - . /: , 2004.
9. . . : - . /: , 2003.
10. . . // . 2003. N 1. . 41 - 50.
11. Carless S. A., Paola C. The measurement of cohesion in work teams // Small Group Research. 2000. V. 31. N 1. P. 71 - 88.
12. Carron A. V., Brawley L. R. Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues // Small Group Research. 2000. V. 31. N1. P. 89 - 106.
13. Carron A. V., Brawley L. R., Eys M. A. et al. Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An Empirical Analysis // Small Group Research. 2003. V. 34. N 4. P. 468 - 496.
14. Carron A. V., Brawley L. R., Widmeyer W. N. The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups // Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement / Ed. J. L. Duda. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Inform. Techn., 1998. P. 213 - 226.
15. Cota A. A., Evans C. R., Dion K. L., Kilik L., Longman R. S. The structure of group cohesion // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995. V. 21. P. 572 - 580.
. 52
16. Dion K. R. Group cohesion: From "field of forces" to multidimensional construct // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2000. 4. P. 7 - 26.
17. Dion K. L., Evans C. R. On cohesiveness: reply to Keyton and other critics of the construct // Small Group Research. 1992. V. 23. P. 242 - 250.
18. Dyce J. A., Cornell J. Factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire among musicians // Journal of Social Psychology. 1996. V. 136. P. 263 - 264.
19. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes // Human Relations. 1954. V. 7. P. 117 - 140.
20. Festinger L. Informal social communication // Psychological Review. 1950. V. 57. P. 271 - 282.
21. Fisch R., Daniel H. D., Beck D. Kleingruppenforschung - Forschungsschwerpunkte und Forschungstrends// Gruppendynamik. 1991. V. 22. N 3. P. 237 - 261.
22. Gammage K. L., Carron A. V., Estabrooks P. A. Team cohesion and individual productivity: the influence of the norm for productivity and the identifiability of individual effort // Small Group Research. 2001. V. 32. N 1. P. 3 - 18.
23. Golembiewski R. The small group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1962.
24. Hogg M. A. The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.
25. Hogg M. A., Abrams D., Otten S., Hincle S. The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups // Small group research. 2004. V. 35. N 3. P. 246 - 276.
26. Lott A. J., Lott B. D. Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables // Psychological Bulletin. 1965. V. 64. P. 259 - 309.
27. Mudrack P. E. Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion // Small Group Behavior. 1989. V. 20. P. 37 - 49.
28. Mullen B., Copper C. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration//Psychological Bulletin. 1994. V. 115 (2). P. 210 - 227.
29. Schutz R. W., Eom H. J., Smoll F. L., Smith R. E. Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire // Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1994. V. 65. P. 226 - 236.
30. Steiner I. D. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
31. Tajfel H., Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict // The Social psychology of intergroup relations/Eds. W. Austin, S. Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979. P. 33 - 47.
32. Tajfel H., Turner J. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour // Psychology of intergroup relations / Eds. S. Worchel & W. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986. P. 7 - 24.
33. Turner J., Hogg M., Oakes P., Reicher S., Wetherell M. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell, 1987.
34. Widmeyer W. N., Brawley L. R., Carron A. V. Measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Canada: Spodym Publishers, 1985.
35. Zaccaro S. Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality // Journal of Social Psychology. 1991. V. 131. P. 387 - 399.
36. Zaccaro S., Lowe C. Cohesiveness and performance: Evidence for multidimensionality // Journal of Social Psychology. 1988. 128. P. 547 - 558.