A. I. Prikhidko
Student, dept. of psychology, Moscow State University
The problem of unemployment and related social-political consequences to people in situation of demotion are considered. The role of cognitive factors in choice of strategies of coping behavior in situation of demotion is analyzed.
Key words: demotion, unemployment, coping behavior, strategies of coping behavior, personal constructs, discourse analyses.
. 112
: . .
C) 2001.
,
("coping behavior") - . , , - .
: , , , .
, , - . , , , , ().
, , , , [3], - 17-19 . [5]. , .
("coping behavior") . , , [4, 8-10]. . ( ) [1], . ( ) [7] . , , , , [4]. , - .
|
|
- - - : , . -, .
, , , , , .
15 (12 3 ) - 3- , 18 24 , . 20 , : 16 4 18 - 24- , .
. 113
. [5].
.
- " ", [10]. .
. .
t- ( - - ). H 0 p <=.05; .05 <= <=. 1 .
, , (-, Z =.730; =.660 Z =.474; =. 978 ). . 1.
, , : , , (-, Z = 1.464; =. 028).
, , , , .. .
|
|
, , , : ( > 5.5 st 3 15 - , - 15 20); (Mann-Whithey, U = 97.00; =. 080) , , - ; (-, Z = 1.659; =.008). .
- :
- , ( 2 2.5 ) (. 2). ; , , . , , - , , "" .
(. 2); " " (. 4).
" " (. 1); (. 2.5);
1. :
: | ||||||
14.00 | 11.00 | 25%-12.00 | 15.00 | 10.00 | 25%-13.00 | |
75%-18.00 | 75%-18.00 | |||||
13.00 | 15.00 | 25%-9.00 | 16.50 | 17.00 | 25%-13.00 | |
75%-17.00 | 75%-18.50 |
. 114
2. :
: | ||||||
14.00 | 9.00 | 25%-12.00 | 14.50 | 10.00 | 25%-13.00 | |
75%-17.00 | 75%-16.00 | |||||
10.00 | 10.00 | 25%-8.00 | 8.00 | 7.00 | 25%-7.00 | |
75%-14.00 | 75%-9.00 | |||||
14.00 | 12.00 | 25%-11.00 | 14.50 | 13.00 | 25%-12.25 | |
75%-18.00 | 75%-15.75 | |||||
14.00 | 9.00 | 25%-12.00 | 8.50 | 8.00 | 25%-7.25 | |
75%-16.00 | 75%-9.00 | |||||
" " | 12.00 | 8.00 | 25%-10.00 | 15.50 | 9.00 | 25%-12.25 |
75%-15.00 | 75%-16.00 |
(. 4).
|
|
(. 5).
.
- , (- , Z = 2.391; < 10 -3). , , ( ) , , "" .
(Mann-Whithey, U = 87.00; =.036).
, (-, Z = 1.317; =. 062).
, ( , , , , ), -, : ( , , ), (, , , ) ( , ). .
- , ( 1 5), ( 2 5), ( 3 5).
, ( 1.5 5) ( 1.5 5).
( - 1 10 - 3.5 10), 6- 5- 10 , ( 2 10) ( 3.5 10).
, , - ( 1 10), ( 2 10) ( 3 10).
, , - , , , .
-
. 115
.
(), . , , , .
|
|
- , . , , (, ) . , , (6 15, 1 10); (10 20, 1 10). , , - . (7 20, 1 10), (1 2 10 ). , , , , , .
, .
, , .
; , .
- , , . , , , "" .
1. . . ., 1994.
2. .. - // . . 1992. . 13. N 3. . 121-130.
3. .., B.C. . .,1991.
4. - .. "Coping behavior" // . . 1997. . 18. N 5. . 20-30.
5. // . .. . , 1998.
6. X. . . ., 1994.
7. . // . 1987. N 1. . 27-34.
8. Carver C.S., Schier M.F., Weintraub J.K. Assessing Coping Strategies: A theoretically based approach // J. Pers. And Soc. Psychol. 1989. V. 56. P. 267-283.
9. Petrovsky J., Birkimer J.. The relationship among locus of control, coping styles and psychological symptom reporting // J. Clin. Psychol. 1991. V. 47. N 3. P. 336-345.
10. Pretzlik U., Sandalis . Parental problems: children's coping and their self-esteem // International society of Behavioral Development. XIIIth Meeting Amsterdam, 1994.
. 116