.


:




:

































 

 

 

 


7-3-15




( - 27%, 88%) .

 

. () ( 49%) .

 

Pearce JM, Campbell S. A comparison of symphysis-fundal height and ultrasound as screening tests for light-for-gestational age infants. BJOG 94: 100-1041987.

Neilson JP. Symphysis-fundal height measurement in pregnancy (Cochrane Review)In: The Reproductive Health Library, Issue 8, 2005.

 

Persson B, Stangenberg M. Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus heigh. BJOG 93: 206-211 1986.

 

The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, November 2002.

 

Gardosi, Jason & Francis, Andre. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. BJOG106: 309-317 1999.

7-3-16

() () . , 10- 10- . 72.994.5% 50.683.8%. : - 33.389.2% - 53.790.9%.

 

, Chang et al., , 10- , . , .

 

, , , , , , , .

 

( ) , . ( ) .

 

, , . , . , , . . .

 

. . : , . . , .

 

. - 72.994.5% - 50.683.8% . .

 

The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. November 2002.

Vandenbosche RC, Kirchner JTR. Intrauterine growth retardation.

Am Fam Physician. 1998 Oct 15;58(6):1384-90

Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol. 1992 80(6):1030-8.

 

 

7-3-17

: .

 

, , , , /.

, - . () 2.4 10- 1.2 - 25- . - 0.6 0.8. .

 

, 2000 ., , . , , 3.6 0.8 . , , 2.7 0.7 . , , .

, .

 

, , . , . , .

 

Ferrazzi E, Bellotti M, Vegni C, Barbera A, Della Peruta S, Ferro B, et al

Umbilical flow waveforms versus fetal biophysical profile in hypertensive pregnancies.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989;33:

 

The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. November 2002.

7-3-18 ,

, ( , ).

 

The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. November 2002.

7-3-19 ( )

 

() ; , , , , , , . , , . .

 

() 1950- . 1960- , , . , ( , , ).

 

, , . -, ( , ). -, , . , .

 

, . , 10% . , , , , . , .

 

: , , .

 

: /, , - , , 85% 28 - 32 .

 

. , : , , , . 3 .

 

Parer JT, King T. Fetal heart rate monitoring: is it salvageable?

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;182(4):982-7

The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. November 2002.

7-3-20

 

() - , 30 . , , , , . - , .

 

- . 0 () 2 () 4 , III. 8 10 . , .

 

(6 10 - ), 75%. , , . (II-3B).

 

2 : .

 

2 , . . - . 2-8 , 1-2 , < 1 - > 8 - . - . , , . 5- 95- , .

 

4,74/1000 1,33/1000 . (II-3B) 8 10 6 10 ( ), . 34 . (III-C).

 

Robert Liston,Vancouver BC, Joan Crane, Foetal health surveillance in labour., SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. No. 112,April 2002.

7-3-21

 

- , . , .

 

, , , , . , (2.7% ). , .

 

. , , , /.

 

, ; , , .

 

- (). , , .

 

- , 3-7 .

 

38% ( 15-55%) (I-A).

 

, 2 .

 

Fetal Health Surveillance In Labour. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines NO. 112 2002.

The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. November 2002.

C 7-3-22

, . , . , , , , , , . , .

. , , . , , , . . , , (II-3). , ( ) , (III-C) (, ).

The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. November 2002.

 

Fetal Health Surveillance In Labour SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines NO. 112. 2002.

 

7-3-23

, . , .

 

, . , , , .

The Use of Electronic Fetal Monitoring - The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 8. RCOG Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2001.

7-3-24

 

1. . . (A).

 

2. . (A).

 

3. (B).

 

4. , , , , . (A).

 

5. :

a) , , , (C).

b) (A).

c) (C).

 

6. , , , . (C).

 

7. 15 , , 5 (C).

 

8. . , , . , (C).

 

9. (C).

 

10. - , , , , , (B).

 

11. , , , (C).

 

Fetal Health Surveillance In Labour. SOGC (Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada) Clinical Practice Guidelines NO. 112. 2002.

Robert Liston, MB, FRSC., Vancouver BC Joan Crane, MD, FRCSC, St Johns NF SOGC (Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada) clinical practice directives # 112, April 2002.

7-3-25

 

, , , .

 

, . - , (.., , , , ).

 

, , , , .

 

, (.., ). , . , .

 

- , , .

- - , . - , ( ), . . - .

 

- - , , , , , , , .

 

. - . - , .

 

- . . , .

 

; . . .

 

( - ) , , . , .

Codes in International Classification of Diseases (10th revision):

Class XVI. SOME CONDITIONS OF THE PERINATAL PERIOD (00- 95)

03. Stunted growth and malnutrition of the foetus

 

Savel'eva GM, Chekhonin VP, Pavlova TA, Kushch IB, Shalina RI, Rogatkin SO, Morozov SG, Volodin NN An immunochemical analysis of the function of the hemato-encephalic barrier in acute fetal hypoxia and asphyxia neonatorum. Akush Ginekol (Mosk). 1991 Feb;(2):43-6. (Article in Russian)

Inappropriate use of the terms fetal distress and birth asphyxia. ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric) Practice. Committee Opinion #303: Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104(4):903

7-3-26 (1)

 

. - , , .

Fetal Health Surveillance In Labour. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines NO. 112. 2002.

7-3-27 (2)

.

 

є.

 

.

 

Inappropriate use of the terms fetal distress and birth asphyxia.. ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) Committee on Obstetric Practice Opinion #303: Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104(4):903

7-3-28

.

 

 

4.

 





:


: 2016-12-05; !; : 660 |


:

:

, .
==> ...

1706 - | 1464 -


© 2015-2024 lektsii.org - -

: 0.097 .