, , . 41% 50% , (Jung & Bühringer, 1989; , , , , , ). , . (Vollmer et al., 1982), : 40% , , , 25%, 45%. , 1980 ( ). 80- , (. . 34.3.8). , , .
34.3.8.
( 6 ) | |||
(Polich et al., 1981): 4 (N = 600) | |||
15% | 28% | 18% | 54% |
(Kufner, Feuerlein & Huber, 1988; Kufner & Feuerlein, 1989): 1,5 (N = 1410 21 ) | |||
3% | 53% | 9% | 38% |
: 4 (N = 1068) | |||
7% | 66% | 4% | 30% |
(Jung & Bühringer, 1989): 4 (N = 491) | |||
7% | 41% | 16% | 43% |
90- . , (Süß, 1995) : , , , , . 23 21 , . . , .
|
|
, 34 48%, , . , , , . . 0,58 0,88, . 0,01 0,89, , . , , 0,32. ( ). , . , .
(Hester &Miller, 1995), 3.1, , . 219 (!) 12 (, ). (Methodological Quality Scores; MQS). , 37% , , , , 42% 85% , . (Cumulative Evidence Scores; CES). (Methodische Qualität der Studien; MQS-) . , . , , , , - . , , , .