, , , , . , , , . , , , . . . , . , , .
. , . :
1)
2) , , . , , .
. , , , , , . , , . , , . , , , . . ; . , , , , . , ' , . , , :
, , , , , , , . . , :
AN ARGUMENT IS A BUILDING -
We've got the framework for a solid argument.
(, ) .
If you don't support your argument with solid facts, the whole thing will collapse. (, ) , .
|
|
|
is trying to buttress his argument with a lot of irrelevant facts, but it is still so shaky that it will easily fall apart under criticism.
, , .
With the groundwork you've got, you can construct a pretty strong argument. .
, ; :
:
JOURNEY
So far, we haven't covered much ground (progress, content).
(, ) (
).
This is a roundabout argument (directness).
, ().
We need to go into this further in order to see clearly what's involved (progress
obviousness).
, ,
(, ).
CONTAINER
You have all the right ideas in your argument, but the argument is still not transparent (content, progress, clarity).
(, ) , (, ) (, , ).
These ideas form the solid core of the argument (strength, basicness).
(, )
(, ).
BUILDING
We've got a foundation for the argument, now we need a solid framework (basicness, strength, structure).
, (, , ).
We have now constructed most of the argument (progress, content).
(, ).
, , , . , , . , :
: , , , .
: , .
: , . , ; . , The foundation of your argument does not have enough content to support your claims ' , (, )' The framework of your argument does not have enough substance to withstand criticism ' (, ), '.
|
|
|
, (content-defining surfaces).
, , . , , . , , , , , , . , , :
This is a shallow argument; it needs more foundation (BUILDING).
,
(, ) ().
We have gone over these ideas in great depth (JOURNEY). (, ) (ŭ).
You haven't gotten to the deepest points yet those at the core of the argument
(CONTAINER).
(, )
().
- - , , . - .
| , | , () | ||
| , | |||
, , , . : . - , , , ; . ( ), , , . ; . :
As we go into the topic more deeply, we find...
. , ...
We have come to a point where we must explore the issues at a deeper level. , .
, , . , (); . , . :
We will be going deeply into a variety of topics.
.
As we go along, we will go through these issues in depth.
, .
We have now covered all the topics at the appropriate levels.
(, ).
, . - , , . , , , .
|
|
|
, , , , . ŭ, , , , . , . :
So far we have constructed the core of our argument.
(, ) .
so far ' ' , constructed , a core . , , core foundation most basic part :
So far we have constructed the foundation of our argument.
.
So far we have constructed the most basic part of our argument.
.
, έ, . , . . : , . . , :
These points are central to our argument and provide the foundation for all that is to come.
, .
We can undermine the argument by showing that the central points in it are weak. , , (, ) .
The most important ideas, upon which everything else rests, are at the core of the argument.
, , (, ).
:
-
.
, .
-
.
, .
, . .
, , understanding is seeing/ - . . . , , . :
We have just observed that Aquinas used certain Platonic notions.
,
|
|
|
.
Having come this far, we can now see how Hegel went wrong.
, , .
, , :
We will now show that Green misinterpreted Kant's account of will.
,
.
Notice that X does not follow from Y without added assumptions. , .
We ought to point out. that no such proof has yet been found.
, .
, .
. - . (, ) ; , . . , - . , , , , . , :
Dig further into his argument and you will discover a great deal. .
We can see this only if we delve deeply into the issues.
, .
Shallow arguments are practically worthless, since they don't show us very much- (, ) , .
- , , - (, , . .) :
We can now see the outline of the argument.
.
If we look carefully at the structure of the argument...
...
, , , ( ) , :
That is remarkably transparent argument.
(, ) .
I didn't see that point in your argument. .
Since your argument isn't very clear, I can't see what you're getting at. , , .
Your argument has no content at all I can see right through it.
, .
. , , , , , , . MORE IS BETTER/ , . , :
That's not much of an argument.
(, ).
Your argument doesn't have any content.
.
It's not a very good argument, since it covers hardly any ground at all.
, -
(, ).
This argument won't do it's just not clear enough.
.
Your argument is too weak to support your claims.
.
The argument is too roundabout no one will be able to follow it.
(, )
.
Your argument doesn't cover the subject matter in enough depth. .
, ? , . , , , . , . . , MbI , , . . , : !, . .
|
|
|
, , , , , , . , , , , (, ) , , , , . , , : , , . , , , . ; , , , .
