, . , , . , , , . . , , . , . , (, . .) . . , . .
. , . , , , , . . .
, , (), , (, ). , , . , , , .
, , . , 0 . , , . . , , . . . , , , .
, , , ( , ) . , , :
|
|
: , , , .
: , , .
: .
: .
: , , .
: . .
: , .
: , .
, . , . , : AN ARGUMENT IS A JOURNEY ' - ', ARGUMENT IS A CONTAINER ' - ' AN ARGUMENT IS A BUILDING ' - '. , . , , , , . : , , , ?
, . , , , . :
AN ARGUMENT IS A JOURNEY
We have set out to prove that bats are birds.
(, ), .
When we get to the next point, we shall see that philosophy is dead. , , .
So far, we've seen that no current theories will work.
, .
|
|
We will proceed in a step by step fashion. .
Our goal is to show that hummingbirds are essential to military defense. (, ) , .
This observation points the way to an elegant solution.
.
We have arrived at a disturbing conclusion. .
, JOURNEY DEFINES PATH/ .
JOURNEY DEFINES A PATH
strayed from the path. .
He's gone off in the wrong direction. .
They're following us. .
I'm lost.
.
, :
AN ARGUMENT DEFINES A PATH
strayed from the line of argument.
(, ).
Do you follow my argument?
(, ) ?
Now we've gone off in the wrong direction again. .
I'm lost.
.
You're going around in circles. .
, ( , , , , , ):
THE PATH OF A JOURNEY IS A SURFACE
We covered a lot of ground.
(, ).
He's on our trail.
.
strayed off the trail. .
We went back over the same trail. .
, :
THE PATH OF AN ARGUMENT IS A SURFACE -
We have already covered those points.
(, ).
We have covered a lot of ground in our argument.
(, ).
Let's go back over the argument again.
(, ).
You're getting off the subject. .
You're really onto something else.
- (, - ).
We're well on our way to solving this problem. .
. , : :
:
,
, -
, . . , , .
- ,
, , , , , . , AN ARGUMENT is A CONTAIN-ER/ . , ( -, ), , (, , ). , .
|
|
AN ARGUMENT IS A CONTAINER -
Your argument doesn't have much content. .
That argument has holes in it.
(. ).
You don't have much of an argument, but his objections have even less substance. , (, ) .
Your argument is vacuous.
.
I'm tired of your empty arguments.
(, ) .
You won't find that idea in his argument. .
That conclusion falls out of my argument.
(, ) .
Your argument won't hold water.
(, ).
Those points are central to the argument the rest is peripheral. , .
I still haven't gotten to the core of his argument.
(, ) .
, . . ( versus ), . (), (). , .
:
At this point our argument doesn't have much content.
(, ) .
In what we've done so far, we have provided the core of our argument. (, ) .
If we keep going the way we're going, we'll fit all the facts in.
,
.
, . . ŭ , , , . , , ; , . . ( ), ( ). , , , . . , ( ), ( ). , , , , . . , ( ), ( ).
, . , :
|
|
, , .
A PATH IS A SURFACE/ -
, , , .
, ( ):
-
, ,
.
, , , .
, ( ):
-
, , .
, , , .
. .
-
-
, , .
, , .
, , .
, , . , , . . , . . . , , . , (coherent), (consistent), , .
: . , , , . ? , , : . . , , . , - , . , , . :
We can now follow the path of the core of the argument.
(, ) .
The content of the argument proceeds as follows. .
The direction of his argument has no substance. . .
I am disturbed by the vacuous path of your argument. .
, . , . , , . , , . ŭ , . , , .
, , :
|
|
_ ( ).
__ ( ).
_ . , , έ, , , , ( ), , ( ).
, .
, , , . .
; , , .