2. : . .
3. : , , , .
4. , , . 3 . .
.
2
1:
1. , .
2. ( ) . .
.
3
1 0,954 :
1. , .
2. 20 . , .
4
14 %, 10 % , .
.
5
:
38 -
| , | , ./ | , | , ./ | |
, .
20
1
20 %- , . .:
39 -
| 36,0 | 8,0 | 29,0 | 2,0 | ||
| 63,0 | 15,0 | 47,0 | 11,0 | ||
| 43,0 | 9,0 | 21,0 | 4,0 | ||
| 58,0 | 15,0 | 38,0 | 7,0, | ||
| 70,0 | 18,0 | 60,0 | 14,0 | ||
| 86,0 | 25,0 | 65,0 | 17,0 | ||
| 27,0 | 5,0 | 35,0 | 6,0 | ||
| 39,0 | 9,0 | 80,0 | 25,0 | ||
| 48,0 | 10,0 | 57,0 | 13,0 | ||
| 61,0 | 16,0 | 44,0 | 10,0 | ||
| 52,0 | 14,0 | 23,0 | 3,0 | ||
| 67,0 | 20,0 | 64,0 | 16,0 | ||
| 94,0 | 27,0 | 41,0 | 7,0 | ||
| 46,0 | 9,0 | 75,0 | 21,0 | ||
| 42,0 | 8,0 | 49,0 | 11,0 |
1. , .
|
|
|
2. : . .
3. : , , , .
4. , , . 3 . .
.
2
1:
1. , .
2. ( ) . .
.
3
1 0,954 :
1. , .
2. 66,0 . . , .
4
109,3 %, 106,7 %. .
5
( , 2008 .=100%)
40 -
| 2009 . | 2010 . | 2011 . | 2012 . | |
| () | 97,0 | 98,3 | 100,6 | 106,2 |
2009 2012 .
:
- ;
- ;
- ;
- .
.
, :
- ;
- ;
- ;
- / .
1. .. : . . .:
, 2008. 479 .
2. .. : . - .: -, 2011. 565 .
3. , . . : / . ... .: , 2010. 416 .
4. , . . .: , 2007. 368 .
|
|
|
5. : . / . .. . - .: , 2008. 512 .
6. / . .: .
7. : / . ... .: , 2008. 656 .
1
