1. . .
2. ? .
3. .
4. .
5. .
6. ? , .
7. .
8. , .
9. , .
10. ? , .
11. . .
12. , .
VII. , .
1. , .
2. , .
3. , .
4. , .
5. , .
6. , .
7. , .
8. , .
9. , .
10. , .
11. , .
12. , .
VIII. , .
1. , .
2. .
3. ?
4. ? .
5. ? , .
6. ? 2 .
7. ? .
8. ? . .
9. ?
10. ? , .
11. ?
12. ?
III
I. , . 20 .
The Board of Inquiry
The Board of Inquiry was established to conduct hearings into complaints made by members of the public about the conduct of police
officers.
Members of the public do not make their complaints directly to Board of Inquiry. Complaints are made to a police force or the Police Complaints Commissioner. The police forces public complaints bureau investigates the complaint, with monitoring by the Police Complaints Commissioner, although the Commissioner may also conduct the investigation directly. Only a small percentage of the public complaints actually reach the stage of a Board of Inquiry hearing. The Board may hear a complaint only in one the following ways:
|
|
|
1. A chief of police may order a Board hearing after reviewing the report of the investigation of a public complaint;
2. The Police Complaints Commissioner may order a Board hearing after reviewing a chief of police decision or an internal disciplinary hearing decision; or
3. A police officer may appeal to the Board when a penalty is imposed after an internal disciplinary hearing arising out of a public complaint.
The parties in a Board hearing include the police officer, the Police Complaints Commissioner, and the complainant, as well as the chief of police if the case is an appeal by a police officer. A three-member Board hears evidence and submissions from the parties. Hearings are not quite as formal as court proceedings, and a wider range of evidence may be admitted. The Board has developed Rules of Practice to give the public a clear understanding of the Boards hearing process, and to help all parties to participate in a fair and effective manner.
The Police Services Act states that the Board may find a police officer guilty of misconduct only if there is clear and convincing evidence. Misconduct is defined in the Act as a violation of certain provisions of the Act or regulations, including the Code of Conduct which is part of the regulations. Where the Board finds misconduct, it has the power to impose a penalty ranging from a reprimand to loss of pay or days off, suspension, demotion or dismissal.
II. there is , .
1. Look! a photograph of your brother in the newspaper!
2. Did you buy any eggs? No, any eggs in the shop.
3. some rain tomorrow afternoon.
4. any letters for me yesterday?
5. good film on TV tomorrow evening?
6. Excuse me, a bank near here? Yes, at the end of end the street.
