. : 1) , "", , (), (.). , , , (., .). , - , () . , , , .
, . - .
, . , , , , , , . , . [47]. , . ( .). . [48].
" "[49] , . , , . , - . , (, .) . , , - , ( ) .
, . - , . " , ", - [50].
, , , , , , . , .
|
|
|
. , . , , , . , - , "" , . , , -. ., -, [51]. , , , . , , , , . . " ", , . , , , . , . , , [52]. "", , . , , . , . , , .
[1] .: ո . . . . ., 1994.
[2].: Milner H. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relftions Theory: a Critique//Review of International Studies. 1991. 17. P. 67-83.
[3].: Cooperation under Anarchy. Ed. K.Dye//World Politics. October 1985. 38. P. 1. Waltz R. Theory of International Politics. Reading. Mass. 1979. P. 88-89.
[4].: Milner H. The Assumrtion of anarchy in international relations theory: a critique//Review of International Srudies. 1991. 17. P. 71.
[5] , , .. .: Wendt A. Anarchy is what State make of it: the Social Construction of Power Politics//International Organization. Winter 1992. v. 46. 2. P. 392.
[6].: Ibid. P. 393.
[7].: Ibid. P. 404.
[8].: Ibidem.
[9] : Nye J. S. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. N.Y. 1997.
[10].: Tucker R.W. The quality of Nations. N.Y. 1977.
|
|
|
[11].: Waltz R. Op. cit.
[12].: Axelrod R. The evolution of Cooperation. N.Y. 1984.
[13].: ..
[14].: Bull H. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. Hampshire and London. 1995. 329 P.
[15] . //. . ., 1991. . 160.
[16]Riasanovsky. Russia and the West//The Teaching of the Slavophiles. Harvard. 1952. P. 29.
[17]. : Treadgold D. P. The West: in Russia in China. Cambridge. 1967. 170-171.
[18].: Nozick R. Anarchy, State and Utopia. N.Y. 1974.
[19].: Ibid. P. 3-5.
[20] . . ., 1996. . 198.
[21] . . 202.
[22].: // . 1995. 1-4.
[23] , , , , , .: .. " " . .. 1997.
[24] . . ., 1994. . 9.
[25].: .. . .-. 1929. . II. . 144.
[26] . . . 1985. . 93.
[27] .. ( )//. 1993. 3. . 194-216.
[28].: .. // .. . . ., 1990. . 284-285.
[29] . . 267.
[30].: Fnarchism Today. Td. by. D.Apter fnd J.Joll. N.Y. 1972.
[31]ո . . . . . 123.
[32] . //. . ., 1991. . 151.
[33] . . 157.
[34] Shapiro L.Vekhi Group and the Mystique of Revolution/SEER XXXIV. December 1956. P. 67. : Traedgold D.Op. cit. P. 236.
[35].: Wendt F., Friedheim D. International Organization. Autumn 1995. Vol. 49. 4. P. 700-705, 720-721.
[36].: .. " ".
[37].: Calhoun C. Critical Social Theory. Culture, History and the Challenge of Difference. Cambridge. 1996. P. 193-230.
[38].: Borofsky B. Liberalism from Self: A Theory of Personal Autonomy. N.Y. 1996. P. 9-10.
[39].: The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking tht Other. Ed. by R.Bernasconi and D.Woods. N.Y. 1988. Warner D. Levinas. Buber and the Concept of Otherness on International Relations: A Reply to David Campbell//Millenium: Yournal of International Studies. 1996.
[40].: ., . . ., 1996.
[41]Wendt A. Op. cit. P. 399.
[42].: ., . . . 120.
[43].: Neumann I.B. Russia and Idea of Europe. A Study in Identity and International Relations. L., N.Y. 1966.
[44]Wendt A. Op. cit. P. 399.
[45]Ibid. P. 410.
[46].: Fish M.S. The travails of Liberalism//Journal of Democracy. April 1996. Vol. 7. 2. P. 105-117.
[47].: Rose M.A.. The Post-Modern and the Post-Industrial. A Critical Analysis. Cambridge. 1991. P. 44-52, 92, 125, 128, 195, 218 .
[48].: Botwinick A. Postmodernism and Democratic Theory. Philadelphia. 1993. P. 199.
[49]Jamson E. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalims. Durham. 1993. P. IX-XXI.
[50]. : Bennet J. "How is it, then, that we still, Remain Barbarians?". Foucault, Schiller anf the Aesthetization of Ethics//Political Theory. November 1996. P. 659.
[51].: .. // . 1995. 2.
[52].: Nozik R. Op. cit. P. 5.
