Some people prefer reading books, but other people think that it better to watch film version. For my mind, this problem is very actuality today, because there are many good books and interesting films were shot by this books.
I think, that people should read books and after that watch film versions of this books. For me, this is the right way.
There are many bad films. And if you do not read the book, you will have a wrong opinion about this piace of art. But it is not right!
For me, if you read a book, you become more clever, more wiser. When you read your brain is working. When you read, you can know what a writer thiks, when he writes this book. And this is very mainly when you are reading.
But when you watch television or books film version you become stupid, I think. Your brain does not work so hard, because it is more easier to watch the film then to read a book.
In conclusion I want to say that people should read books. And after that if they want, they should watch this film. But reading books it is necessary, for my mind.
( ), :[12]( , ).
1.1. ? . , , .
1.2. ? : I think, that people should read books and after that watch film versions of this books. , : For me, this is the right way.
There are many bad films. And if you do not read the book, you will have a wrong opinion about this piace of art. But it is not right!
For me, if you read a book, you become more clever, more wiser. When you read your brain is working. When you read, you can know what a writer thiks, when he writes this book. And this is very mainly when you are reading.
, , , .
1.3. 1-2 ? .
1.4. , ()? .
1.5. ? : In conclusion I want to say that people should read books. And after that if they want, they should watch this film. But reading books it is necessary, for my mind.
, , , , , . , : , . , : .
|
|
|
, . 1 .
( ), . .
2.1. ? , . , , , , ; , .
2.2. ? , ; : for my mind, for me.
1 .
(), .
3.1. ? .
3.2. , , ? . .
3.3. , (collocations), ( ) ? , , , actuality, .
2 .
(), .
4.1. ? .
4.2. ? , . ? , , , this books, more wiser, .
1 .
( ) 1 ( 2), ( piace, thiks, then; In conclusion; ).
, 6 .
23. .
|
|
|
1
( ) (213 )
Nowadays, many people have a choice either to read a book, or just see a movie version of it. But do films give the same impression and emotions? Is there any difference between reading and watching?
From my point of view, nothing in the world can possibly compare to the book, although now there are such strong competitors as the Internet and TV But only with the help of the book you see everything, every emotion, every event, every detail. Due to the budget and standart length of films, directors are just unable to put all the scenes in to it, so we lose important information. Moreover, you can always take your book with you, read it on your way to work or just keep it in your home library.
However other people think, that reading is a waste of time. Futher more, many of those are sure, that its pointless to read, when there is a perfect chance of watching, but may be its just their lazy bones.
To sum up, I would say, that yes, books might be losing their priority and status but they will always remain a good friend of yours and perfect source of information. But it will always be everyones personal choice whether to read or not.
2
( ) (267 )
Books or their screened versions? It seems that this question began to trouble people as soon as television appeared. Starting from that time, people had divided into two groupes: those who enjoy reading and those who enjoy watching film versions. Whos right?
Speaking about me, Id rather read a book. Firstly, reading books is the oldest activity. Therefore, when I open a book, I feel connected to history, dive into the past, whereas watching a film takes me nowhere. Secondly, while reading, I get pleasure out of crispy paper and smell of a book, when a film has none of these qualities. Finally, authors always leave something to think about to their readers, to use our imagination. What can I think about when everything is shown to meon my DVD?
Alternatively, there are people who prefer watching films based on famous books. I understand them partially. In the beginning, those films are always abridged. It means that some parts of the text are omitted, which ends up in the loss of the zest of the original work. Furthermore, a film is directed by a different person, so it is another piece of work with its own notions, purposes and impressions. Lastly, people, who go to a cinema to watch a best-seller based on an excellent book, dont stand a chance to stop it and pay attention to the facts theyve missed, while readers may have a break and get back to each moment they firstly ignored.
To sum up, this disagreement is endless. Each person should decide for himself whether to choose a film or a book.
1
