The author is Byron R. Wien. He is a British publicist, the senior managing director at Blackstone Advisory Partners.
Byron R. Wien. BlackstoneAdvisoryPartners.
The main problem of the article is whether the current recovery in the US economy is a secular change or not.
, .
(Thecourse)
(4-7 ) .
Thearticledealswith ( )
The objective of the paper is ( )
The author informs us about ( )
The author gives us some information on (ѐ )
The author traces the history of ( )
Theauthorshowsus ( )
4. (Conclusions):
Theauthorconcludesthat ( , )
In conclusion the author says that ( , )
5. (Personal attitude):
I find the article worthwhile / worth reading / interesting because ( / , )
:
Thearticlesuggestedtoyourattentionistakenfrom , ,
The article deals with the problem of
The author shares his opinion on
The author gives account of
The author analyses the reasons for / of
The author reviews his observations of
The article begins with (the general statement) (, )
The events take place in
The author goes on to say that ,
I was impressed with the fact that ѐ,
It seems significant for me that ,
Inconclusion, theauthorsuggeststhat ,
The author comes to the conclusion that ,
I find the article worthwhile because ,
The problem raised in the article is urgent because ,
The information given in the article is valuable because ,
I sharetheauthorsviewson ,
What impressed me most is the fact that ѐ,
The author comments on the major news of the story
The author gives a full coverage of
The author gives much space to
|
|
|
The author spotlights that fact that ѐ,
The author brings out the problem of
The author summarizes his observations of
The author concentrates / focuses on
The author gives a detailed account of ѐѐ
Theauthorgivesprominenceto
:
http://www.americanlawyer.com/
http://www.law.com
http://www.ejil.org
https://www.thelawyer.com\
http://www.legalweek.com/
http://www.crimemagazine.com
| TheFinancialTimes ѐ . The US will continue to lose market share By Byron R. Wien Published: February 16 2010 13:03 | Last updated: February 16 2010 13:26 The debate about the current recovery centres on whether a secular change is taking place in the United States economy. If it is not, then we should all be optimistic because peak-to-trough declines in real GDP of 4 per cent are usually followed by gains of 6-8 per cent. But the consensus view is that growth will be sluggish (2-3 per cent) and few jobs will be created. There will be revenue growth to be sure. The weak dollar has clearly helped exports and the 90 per cent of the working population with jobs are spending again, now that their house prices have stabilised and the stock market has come back from its lows of last March. The unemployment rate remains stubbornly near 10 per cent, however, and operating rates for American manufacturers are at 70 per cent, so there isnt much of an incentive for capital spending beyond technology. Moreover, the working week is staying around 33 hours, so even those who are working arent getting their pre-recession paychecks. To get the goods out the door and provide the services demanded by customers, companies are hiring temporary workers in record numbers to maintain maximum flexibility. They are worried that a health care bill, if one passes, will add onerously to the cost of full-time employees and they dont want to be hit with more termination pay if the economy suffers a double-dip. The result of this is that productivity is soaring. The reading of better than 8 per cent growth is the highest in decades. Rather than applaud the efficiency of the American worker one should wonder if the numbers are too good. Are workers being driven to the point of exhaustion? Theres no sign that anyones complaining. Wage rates are barely increasing. Most of us with jobs are glad to have them and arent willing to make any waves. How much longer can this go on? Not much longer in my opinion. The unemployment rate usually starts moving lower about nine months after the economy troughs and that happened in the second quarter of 2009, so we could see jobs created as soon as the February report, which will come out on March 5. I also believe real GDP will be stronger than the consensus expects, as inventories continue to be built and the remaining part of the governments stimulus programme flows through the economy. Longer term I doubt that the United States or Europe will grow faster than 3 per cent anytime in the next five years, while the developing world will grow in excess of 5 per cent. The result of this is that the mature industrial economies are losing about a percentage point a year in share of world GDP to the emerging markets and they are losing a similar amount in share of world stock market capitalisation. The biggest problem the United States is facing is the productivity of capital. After the end of the second world war it took less than two dollars of investment by government, corporations and individuals to produce one dollar of GDP growth. The productivity of capital continued to be impressive until 1980, when Europe had recovered and Japan was producing automobiles and consumer electronics products that found wide acceptance in world markets. In the single decade of the 1980s, the productivity of capital declined from less than two dollars of investment to produce a dollar of growth to about three. If you assign a 30 per cent gross margin to that revenue growth, the return on investment declined from 15 per cent to 10 per cent. That level of return proved to be satisfactory, but in the first decade of this century capital productivity declined seriously in the United States. Because of profligate spending on over-priced housing and other assets that declined seriously and deficit spending by the government, by the end of the decade it took six dollars of capital to produce a dollar of growth. The return on that would only be 5 per cent and few would put money at risk for that reward. When you look abroad to assess our competitive position, the results are not encouraging. It is hard to put together comparable information, but, based on the data I could gather, Europe was still getting a dollar of growth for two dollars of investment and China was getting at least a dollar of growth for each dollar of investment. If the US is to stop losing ground against other mature and developing economies, it is going to have to put money to work more effectively. We are still the leaders in technology and scientific research and we must continue to take advantage of the commercial possibilities of innovation. If we dont reverse the current trends, growth in America beyond this year will be disappointing and our standard of living will decline. Byron R. Wien is senior managing director at Blackstone Advisory Partners |
|
|
|
1. The article suggested to your attention is taken from The Financial Times of February 16, 2010. The headline is The US Will Continue to Lose Market Share,it is suggestive because one can easily guess from the title what the article is going to be about.
2. The author is Byron R. Wien. He is an American publicist, the senior managing director at Blackstone Advisory Partners.
The main problem of the article is whether the current recovery in the US economy is a secular change or not.
3. The author gives an account of the indications of the revenue growth in the near future but fears that this cannot go on much longer. He suggests that the mature industrial economies are losing about a percentage point a year in share of world GDP to the emerging markets and they are losing a similar amount in share of world stock market capitalisation. The author pinpoints the fact that the biggest problem the United States is facing is the productivity of capital. He goes on to a detailed account of the trends in the productivity of capital in the USA and its competitors.
4. The author comes to the conclusion that if the USA do not reverse the current trends, their growth beyond this year will be disappointing and the standard of living will decline.
5. I find the problem touched upon in the article urgent, especially under the present conditions of the global economic crisis. The information given in the article is valuable because it shows us that recovery from the economic recession is a very complex process which involves many different factors.
|
|
|
, , , 100 .
40 . 60 .
| / | ||
| 1. | 0-40 | |
| 2. | - | 0-60 |
| 3. | : | 0-100 |
| 50 | |
| 50- 69 | |
| 70-85 | |
| 86-100 | |
| 50-100 | |
| 50 |
