.


:




:

































 

 

 

 


Social-psychological adaptation in children of Russian migrants in Russian society




V. V. Gritsenko*, N. E. Shoustova**

* Dr. sci. (psychology), head of the chair of psychology, affiliate of Saratov State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky, Balashov

** Cand. sci. (sociology), docent of the same chair

The main results of the research of adaptation in children of forced migrants and refugees from nearest abroad in Saratov region are presented. The correlation between the levels of satisfaction of the different life spheres, current and perspective adaptation is found. There are analyzed the conditions that advantage children's enter new society. The comparative analysis of social- psychological adaptation in children of natives and Russian migrants is given.

Key words: social-psychological adaptation, perspective adaptation, satisfaction.

. 33

.

: . .

. . .

. , . . . ,

. - . .

: , , , .

() . : ( ) [5], [16], [4, 14] ., [12].

(Locus of Control Scale) . (J. Rotter), , . . , - , . , , . : . , , , , [9,20]. , , [13, . 248]. : , .

. , : , , (. [9]). , , , , . [16, . 95]. ( ) .

- - .

- " ", . . [16, . 99 - 101]. - : .

, " " . . . , . . . . , . -

. 34

, [1]. , , .. 84 - , 20.4 . , . , , , 16-PF . , - [17]. : "- " () . . . [11], " " () . . . . [10] IPC, . . . . [7]. " " . . , " " - ( , 1610 ). , , , 17 [8].

, . . , . . . , , " , , " [16, . 104]. , ( , ). , , -. . . , . . [6], . , . . . . [15], , "" . , . . ( ).

. , , , . , -. , . , , .. , . , . , , , . : -, - , - ; [18].

, , , . (, , ). (14 ) , . , - [16, . 95].

. , "-" .

. 35

. , , .

- , . , -.

, : 1) , (. . ); 2) , - ; 3) ( : , , ) .

, - , , .. , .

700 10 21 . , , "" : , ( ) - , , . 6 - 11- . . , - , , - , . . . . , . 2002 .

. , 44 .

1. , .

2. , .

3. - ; , .

4. - , .

5. .

6. , .

7. - - , .

8. , , .

9. , , , .

10. (, ), .

11. , , , , .

12. , , .

13. , , .

14. , , , .

15. , , .

16. , .

17. , .

18. , , .

19. .

20. , .

21. .

. 36

22. , , .

23. , .

24. , .

25. , , .

26. , .

27. , .

28. , .

29. , , - .

30. , , .

31. , , .

32. , .

33. , , , .

34. , .

35. , .

36. .

37. , , , .

38. , .

39. , .

40. , , .

41. , .

42. , , .

43. .

44. , .

: (), (), (), (), (), (), ().

. (. . 1). . . 14 - 17 [8, . 104], 10 - 21 [3].

(- ) : 10- , , (14 - 16 ) (17 - 21 ). 21 - , .

, . 350 (50%), 342 - (48.9%), 8 (1.1%). , , . . 1.

, .

. -

. 1. .

1.

       
10 - 12 31 (4.4%) 14 (4.0%) 17 (5.0%)
13 - 14 209 (29.9%) 99 (28.3%) 110(32.2%)
15 - 16 286 (40.9%) 145 (41.4%) 133 (38.9%)
17 - 18 113(16.1%) 51 (14.6%) 62(18.1%)
19 - 21 59 (8.4%) 39(11.1%) 20 (5.8%)
2 (0.3%) 2 (0.6%)  
700 (100%) 350 (100%) 342 (100%)

. 37

2. (n=700)

7.29 0.078
2.06  
-0.297 0.092
-0.211 0.185
6.60 0.068
1.79  
0.090 0.092
-0.291 0.185
4.98 0.051
1.34  
-0.258 0.092
-0.249 0.185
2.65 0.037
0.99  
-0.390 0.092
-0.392 0.185
2.61 0.035
0.93  
-0.273 0.092
-0.405 0.185
4.69 0.063
1.66  
0.133 0.092
-0.362 0.185
25.56 0.18
4.74  
0.112 0.092
-0.136 0.185

. 2. () .

. "+" ( "") , , "-" ( ""), . . ( ) . . .

, , . . , , (. . 2).

, , .

, , .. (. . 2), , - . , , - . , - , , , , .

"" . 3. , - () . - , .

- , .

(, F - ) -

. 38

, (. . 3), , , -.

.

: . 24.2; "" - 25.7; -25.7; - "" - 27.4. - . . , - 6.9 7.95. - 6.3 ( ) 7.1 ( -).

. - : ) ) -

. , - . "" , : - . : " , - , , ". , . , : . ? ,

. 3. () .

3.

6.92 7.22 7.25 7.95
2.12 1.85 1.92 2.09
6.28 6.37 6.68 7.09
1.72 1.76 1.85 1.75
4.76 5.13 5.06 5.15
1.37 1.31 1.28 1.35
2.35 2.46 2.76 3.07
1.01 0.82 0.93 0.90
2.54 2.81 2.54 2.72
0.92 0.96 0.95 0.90
4.61 4.51 4.50 5.13
1.60 1.61 1.67 1.70
24.22 25.73 25.74 27.40
4.43 4.47 4.68 4.80

. 39

4. ()

48% 31% 21%
34% 37% 29%
30% 32% 38%
20% 34% 46%

5. ()

55% 32% 13%
51% 40% 9%
36% 41% 23%
23% 40% 37%

, , . , , . , "". , . , -, ( "" ), , [19].

, 1/2 - (. . 4). . ( 0.05 χ2.)

. . , (. . 4). : . . 16% 84% , - 21% 48% . . . 72% 4% , 42% 25% . , , - .

( ) ( ), . . , . ( ) (. . 5).

(. . 5) . 55% 13% . 30% , - .

,

. 4. .

. 5. .

. 40

- . , , , , , .

, - - , , , - (. [2]).

. "" "" (F =3.74 α<0.05), "- " (F =2.83 α<0.09), "- " (F =9.08 α<0.003). T- . "" .

2 =12.16 α<0.0071), "" .

, , "" , . , , .

, , "" , "" . - , , . , . - , , , " (, , . - . .) "" , . , "" " [16, . 107]. , . , , - . , , .

, - . - . 10 - 12 25.4 , 19 - 21 - 28.3. . , "" - 13 - 14-. (209 .) - "". 23.9, (25.6). 1%- . "" : ( "" - 6.9 , 19 - 21 - 8.2). , 13 - 14 - 6.9 . , "" 13 - 14-.

1 [5, 8,9] , %. , % , .

. 41

: 10 - 12 (6.4), , 19 - 21 (7.5), , . 13 - 14 (6.2): .

, , . , . . , , . , , : , , , . , . . ; . () () . . [8, . 110], 16, 4 .

, , , , .

, , . - , , - , . - , , , , , , , , . , , . , , , .. ( ) , . - .

, , .

, , , , , - - , , .

1. , .

2. -

. 42

.

3. ( ). - , , .

4. , .

5. "- " , .

- , , . , .

1. . ., . ., . . // . . 1984. . 5. N 3. . 152 - 163.

2. . . - . .: , 2000. . 169 - 170.

3. . ., . . // . . . . . "". . 18. : - , 2001. . 144 - 157.

4. . . . .: - , 2001.

5. . . / . . . . : - , 1994. . 137 - 141.

6. . . // . ., 1989. . (N 139). . 6 - 24.

7. . ., . . // . . 1995. . 16. N 1. . 43 - 51.

8. . . - " " // . . 1999. . 20. N 2. . 103 - 114.

9. . . .: , 1983.

10. . . : . , , 1996.

11. . ., . . - . I-E . // . .: - . . -, 1988. . 131 - 134.

12. / . . . . . : - , 2001.

13. . / . . . . .: , 1998.

14. / . . . . .: - , 2000.

15. . ., . . . .: , 1998. . 220 - 226.

16. . . . .: - , 1999.

17. - / . . . , . ; . . . . : , 1989.

18. . : 2 .: . . / . . . . .: , 1986. . 2.

19. ., . : . . . , . . .: , 1997.

20. Lipp L., Kolstoe R., James W., Randall H. Denial of disability and internal control of reinforcement: A study using a perceptual defense paradigm // J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1968. V. 32. P. 72 - 75.





:


: 2016-12-06; !; : 344 |


:

:

.
==> ...

767 - | 715 -


© 2015-2024 lektsii.org - -

: 0.126 .